共 50 条
A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two different strategies in advanced maternal age: Combined first-trimester screening and maternal blood cell-free DNA testing
被引:7
|作者:
Pan, Min
[1
,2
]
Huang, Lv-Yin
[2
]
Zhen, Li
[2
]
Li, Dong-Zhi
[2
]
机构:
[1] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Med Univ, Guangzhou Women & Childrens Med Ctr, Prenatal Diagnost Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源:
TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
|
2018年
/
57卷
/
04期
关键词:
Cost-effectiveness;
Nuchal translucency;
Prenatal screening;
Cell-free DNA;
Advanced maternal age;
NUCHAL TRANSLUCENCY;
DOWN-SYNDROME;
FETUSES;
WOMEN;
D O I:
10.1016/j.tjog.2018.06.011
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Objective: To estimate cost efficacy of first-trimester screening strategies based on nuchal translucency (NT) and maternal blood cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing in women with advanced maternal age (AMA). Materials and methods: This was a retrospective population-based analysis of all pregnant women with AMA booked for combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) in China over a 3-year period. The assumed screening strategies were the following: cFTS (Strategy 1), cfDNA testing as a first-tier investigation replacing biomarkers after NT measurement (Strategy 2), and cfDNA testing combined with dating ultrasound for all women (Strategy 3). The direct costs were compared between strategies. Results: Strategy 1 was completed in 6443 women with AMA. The respective detection rates were 94.5% and 90.9% for trisomies 21 and 18, with a total screen-positive rate of 13.5%. Such a policy resulted in 871 invasive tests and a total cost of $747,870 or a cost of $116 per person tested. Strategy 2 would result in a total cost of $1,812,570, or a cost of $281 per person tested, with increased detection rates for trisomies 21 and 18, and a decreased number of invasive tests compared with strategy 1. The total cost of Strategy 3 would be $1,675,430, or a cost of $260 per person tested with the least number of invasive tests. Conclusion: The cfDNA modalities have the advantages of higher detection rate for common trisomies and lower screening-positive rate. However, the cost of cfDNA testing needs to decrease significantly if it is to replace the current cFTS practice in a population of AMA on a purely cost effectiveness basis. (C) 2018 Taiwan Association of Obstetrics & Gynecology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 540
页数:5
相关论文