Integrating social science into conservation planning

被引:31
作者
Niemiec, Rebecca M. [1 ]
Gruby, Rebecca [1 ]
Quartuch, Michael [2 ]
Cavaliere, Christina T. [1 ]
Teel, Tara L. [1 ]
Crooks, Kevin [8 ]
Salerno, Jonathan [1 ,7 ]
Solomon, Jennifer N. [1 ]
Jones, Kelly W. [1 ]
Gavin, Michael [1 ]
Lavoie, Anna [1 ]
Stronza, Amanda [3 ]
Meth, Leah [4 ]
Enrici, Ash [1 ]
Lanter, Katie [2 ]
Browne, Christine [5 ]
Proctor, Jonathan [6 ]
Manfredo, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Warner Coll Nat Resources, Human Dimens Nat Resources Dept, 1401 Campus Delivery, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Denver, CO USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecol & Conservat Biol, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[4] Calif Environm Associates, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] US Fish & Wildlife Serv, Washington, DC USA
[6] Defenders Wildlife, Washington, DC USA
[7] Colorado State Univ, Grad Degree Program Ecol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[8] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Social science; Conservation planning; Wolf reintroduction; Adaptive management; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT; HUMAN DIMENSIONS; GOVERNANCE; POLITICS; FRAMEWORK; ATTITUDES; WOLF; POLYCENTRICITY; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109298
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
A growing body of literature has highlighted the value of social science for conservation, yet the diverse approaches of the social sciences are still inconsistently incorporated in conservation initiatives. Building greater capacity for social science integration in conservation requires frameworks and case studies that provide concrete guidance and specific examples. To address this need, we have developed a framework aimed at expanding the role for social science in formal conservation planning processes. Our framework illustrates multiple ways in which social science research can contribute to four stages of such processes: 1) defining the problem and project team; 2) defining goals; 3) identifying impact pathways and designing interventions; and 4) developing and evaluating indicators of success (or failure). We then present a timely case study of wolf reintroduction in Colorado, U.S.A., to demonstrate the opportunities, challenges, and complexities of applying our framework in practice.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systems approach to biodiversity conservation planning
    Lister, NME
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 1998, 49 (2-3) : 123 - 155
  • [42] Integrating Public Health into Climate Change Policy and Planning: State of Practice Update
    Fox, Mary
    Zuidema, Christopher
    Bauman, Bridget
    Burke, Thomas
    Sheehan, Mary
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (18)
  • [43] Integrating biosystematic data into conservation planning: Perspectives from Southern Africa's Succulent Karoo
    Desmet, PG
    Cowling, RM
    Ellis, AG
    Pressey, RL
    SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2002, 51 (02) : 317 - 330
  • [44] Publishing social science research in Conservation Biology to move beyond biology
    Teel, Tara L.
    Anderson, Christopher B.
    Burgman, Mark A.
    Cinner, Joshua
    Clark, Douglas
    Estevez, Rodrigo A.
    Jones, Julia P. G.
    McClanahan, Tim R.
    Reed, Mark S.
    Sandbrook, Chris
    John, Freya A. V. St.
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2018, 32 (01) : 6 - 8
  • [45] The importance of context: Integrating resource conservation with local institutions
    Lejano, Raul P.
    Ingram, Helen M.
    Whiteley, John M.
    Torres, Daniel
    Agduma, Sharon J.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2007, 20 (02) : 177 - 185
  • [46] Integrating indigenous ecological knowledge and customary sea tenure with marine and social science for conservation of bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum) in the Roviana Lagoon, Solomon Islands
    Aswani, S
    Hamilton, RJ
    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 31 (01) : 69 - 83
  • [47] Linking regional planning and local action: Towards using social network analysis in systematic conservation planning
    Mills, Morena
    Alvarez-Romero, Jorge G.
    Vance-Borland, Ken
    Cohen, Philippa
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Guerrero, Angela M.
    Ernstson, Henrik
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 169 : 6 - 13
  • [48] Barriers and Opportunities for Integrating Social Science into Natural Resource Management: Lessons from National Estuarine Research Reserves
    Patrick Robinson
    Ken Genskow
    Bret Shaw
    Robin Shepard
    Environmental Management, 2012, 50 : 998 - 1011
  • [49] Conservation Action Planning: Lessons learned from the St. Marys River watershed biodiversity conservation planning process
    Patterson, Tamatha A.
    Grundel, Ralph
    JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH, 2014, 40 : 7 - 14
  • [50] Mainstreaming the social sciences in conservation
    Bennett, Nathan J.
    Roth, Robin
    Klain, Sarah C.
    Chan, Kai M. A.
    Clark, Douglas A.
    Cullman, Georgina
    Epstein, Graham
    Nelson, Michael Paul
    Stedman, Richard
    Teel, Tara L.
    Thomas, Rebecca E. W.
    Wyborn, Carina
    Curran, Deborah
    Greenberg, Alison
    Sandlos, John
    Verissimo, Diogo
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 56 - 66