Applying multilevel analytic strategies in adolescent substance use prevention research

被引:31
作者
Palmer, RF
Graham, JW [1 ]
White, EL
Hansen, WB
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Coll Hlth & Human Dev, Dept Biobehav Hlth, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Bowman Gray Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC 27103 USA
关键词
multilevel analysis; adolescents; substance use; prevention;
D O I
10.1006/pmed.1998.0311
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. School-based drug prevention programs have been criticized on methodologic grounds because the unit of analysis is often not the unit of randomization, thus increasing the likelihood of Type I errors. Application of multilevel analytic strategies appropriately corrects this biasing tendency. This study demonstrates the practical use of such analysis. Methods. Data from 2,370 seventh-grade students participating in a substance use prevention trial were analyzed using a multilevel strategy. We examined the effectiveness of a social pressure resistance training and a normative education (NORM) intervention against an information-only control group. Results. The NORM condition revealed 1-year program effects for cigarette and marijuana use with individuals as the unit of analysis and only marginal effects with classroom as the unit of analysis. No program effects were found using school as the analysis unit. A multilevel strategy revealed program effects for cigarettes and marijuana with both class and school as grouping levels. The effect for alcohol use was significant at the a-year follow-up. Conclusions. Interventions establishing conservative drug use norms in classrooms may be an effective strategy in reducing substance use onset among adolescents. Utilization of appropriate analytic strategies is important in the analysis and interpretation of data containing nested structures. (C) 1998 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 336
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   STATISTICAL MODELING ISSUES IN SCHOOL EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES [J].
AITKIN, M ;
LONGFORD, N ;
PLEWIS, IF ;
WAKEFIELD, WB ;
CHATFIELD, C ;
GOLDSTEIN, H ;
REYNOLDS, D ;
COX, D ;
ECOB, R ;
GRAY, J ;
BELL, JF ;
BURSTEIN, L ;
DAWID, AP ;
HEALY, MJR ;
HUTCHISON, DA ;
KILGORE, S ;
PENDLETON, WW ;
LAIRD, NM ;
LOUIS, TA ;
PRAIS, SJ ;
RUTTER, M ;
MAUGHAN, B ;
OUSTON, J ;
SHARE, DL ;
SMITH, TMF .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 1986, 149 :1-43
[2]  
[Anonymous], QUASI EXPT
[3]   EARLY-ONSET DRUG-USE AND RISK OF LATER DRUG PROBLEMS [J].
ANTHONY, JC ;
PETRONIS, KR .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1995, 40 (01) :9-15
[4]  
Barcikowski R S, 1994, NIDA Res Monogr, V142, P302
[5]  
Barcikowski R.S., 1981, J EDUC STATIST, V6, P267, DOI [DOI 10.3102/10769986006003267, 10.3102/10769986006003267]
[6]  
Biglan A, 1985, NIDA Res Monogr, V63, P170
[7]  
BOTVIN GJ, 1981, ADV DISEASE PREVENTI, V1, P222
[8]   APPLICATION OF HIERARCHICAL LINEAR-MODELS TO ASSESSING CHANGE [J].
BRYK, AS ;
RAUDENBUSH, SW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1987, 101 (01) :147-158
[9]  
BRYK AS, 1989, AM EDUC RES J, V26, P353, DOI 10.2307/1162978
[10]  
BRYK AS, 1994, HLM HIERARCHICAL LIN