ULTRASOUND MEASUREMENTS OF THE SAPHENOUS VEIN IN THE PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT POPULATION WITH COMPARISON TO I.V. CATHETER SIZE

被引:4
作者
Cole, Ian [1 ]
Glass, Casey [1 ]
Norton, H. James [2 ]
Tayal, Vivek [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
[2] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Charlotte, NC 28232 USA
关键词
US guidance; peripheral venous access; saphenous vein; DIFFICULT INTRAVENOUS ACCESS; BASILIC VEIN; PLACEMENT; COMPLICATIONS; GUIDANCE; CHILDREN; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.06.034
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Saphenous vein cutdown is a rare venous access procedure. Ultrasound (US) can assist with many vascular access procedures. Objectives: Our objective was to identify the saphenous veins (SVs) using US in pediatric emergency department (ED) patients, and to determine if the SV size allows for potential cannulation by different standard-size intravenous (i.v.) catheters. Methods: This study was a prospective, observational convenience sample of 60 pediatric patients at an urban, regional referral pediatric ED. Inclusion criteria were children ages 1 through 12 years categorized into four age groups: 1-<2, 2-4, 5-7, and 8-12 years, with informed consent and assent. Investigators performed US examination using a 10-MHz multi-frequency transducer to identify the SV on both legs and measure the SV in short-axis view. The US measurements were then used to calculate the SV areas. Diameters of typical pediatric gauge (G) catheters (24G, 22G, 20G, 18G) were used to calculate catheter areas. Results: Sixty patients were enrolled, with five SVs unable to be measured in 4 patients (1 patient with both SVs). For the remaining 115 (96%) SVs available for further analysis, the median age was 4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 2) and median weight was 22.7 kg (IQR 14.5). Mean area (mm(2)) of the right SV was 2.85 +/- 1.9 and for the left SV, 2.88 +/- 1.8. For our study group, the compatibility rates of different size i.v. catheters to fit the measured SV areas were as follows: 24G = 100%, 22G = 100%, 20G = 97.3%, and 18G = 86.1%. Conclusions: US can localize the SV in pediatric ED patients. US size of the SV in various pediatric age ranges suggests that the SV may be a potential US venous access site multiple-size i.v. catheters up to 18G. (C) 2012 Elsevier
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 92
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Adelman S, 1976, JACEP, V5, P596, DOI 10.1016/S0361-1124(76)80220-1
[2]   Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians [J].
Bauman, Michael ;
Braude, Darren ;
Crandall, Cameron .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 27 (02) :135-140
[3]   Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients [J].
Brannam, L ;
Blaivas, M ;
Lyon, M ;
Flake, M .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2004, 11 (12) :1361-1363
[4]   Uses and complications of central venous catheters inserted in a pediatric emergency department [J].
Chiang, VW ;
Baskin, MN .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2000, 16 (04) :230-232
[5]  
Constantino TG, 2005, ANN EMERG MED, V46, P456, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ANNE-MERGMED.2004.12.026
[6]   ULTRASOUND-GUIDED PERIPHERAL VENOUS ACCESS VS. THE EXTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN AS THE INITIAL APPROACH TO THE PATIENT WITH DIFFICULT VASCULAR ACCESS [J].
Costantino, Thomas G. ;
Kirtz, Jeremy F. ;
Satz, Wayne A. .
JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2010, 39 (04) :462-467
[7]   Infant Intraosseous Infusion [J].
DeBoer, Scott ;
Russell, Terri ;
Seaver, Michael ;
Vardi, Amir .
NEONATAL NETWORK, 2008, 27 (01) :25-32
[8]   Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Versus Traditional Techniques in Difficult-Access Pediatric Patients [J].
Doniger, Stephanie J. ;
Ishimine, Paul ;
Fox, John Christian ;
Kanegaye, John T. .
PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2009, 25 (03) :154-159
[9]  
Eslami P, 2011, PEDIAT INTRAOSSEOUS
[10]  
GAUDERER MWL, 1992, SURG CLIN N AM, V72, P1267