Getting the Message? Choice, Self-Selection, and the Efficacy of Social Movement Arguments

被引:2
作者
Testa, Paul F. [1 ]
Williams, Tarah [2 ]
Britzman, Kylee [3 ]
Hibbing, Matthew, V [4 ]
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Dept Polit Sci, 111 Thayer St, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Allegheny Coll, Dept Polit Sci, Allegheny, PA USA
[3] Lewis Clark State Coll, Social Sci Program, Lewiston, ID USA
[4] UC Merced, Dept Polit Sci, Merced, CA USA
关键词
self-selection; preference-incorporating choice and assignment design; effect heterogeneity; source cues; social movements; political communication; GENDER; CUES; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1017/XPS.2020.24
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The dynamics of choice and self-selection are central features of politics but absent from most experimental designs. We show how designs that incorporate choice, by allowing some subjects the option to receive or avoid treatment, can be extended by randomizing conditional on subjects' treatment choices to answer further questions of interest while preserving statistical power. We apply this design to study how the gender of messengers for the #MeToo social movement conditions who receives the movement's message and how they respond. Our results, from both convenience and nationally representative samples, suggest that #MeToo movement's message reaches a wide audience with the intended effect. The potential for backlash in response to the message appears limited but more likely when this message is delivered by a woman.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 309
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Polarized Political Communication, Oppositional Media Hostility, and Selective Exposure [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin ;
Johnson, Martin ;
Murphy, Chad .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (01) :174-186
[2]   Educating the Least Informed: Group Endorsements in a Grassroots Campaign [J].
Arceneaux, Kevin ;
Kolodny, Robin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2009, 53 (04) :755-770
[3]   The more things change the more they stay the same - Examining gender differences in political attitude expression, 1952-2000 [J].
Atkeson, LR ;
Rapoport, RB .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2003, 67 (04) :495-521
[4]   American Party Women: A Look at the Gender Gap within Parties [J].
Barnes, Tiffany D. ;
Cassese, Erin C. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2017, 70 (01) :127-141
[5]   Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment [J].
Benford, RD ;
Snow, DA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2000, 26 :611-639
[6]   Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 47 (02) :241-262
[7]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[8]   Sex isn't Gender: Reforming Concepts and Measurements in the Study of Public Opinion [J].
Bittner, Amanda ;
Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth .
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2017, 39 (04) :1019-1041
[9]  
Cameron A., 2005, MICROECONOMETRICS ME, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511811241, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511811241]
[10]   Persuading the Enemy: Estimating the Persuasive Effects of Partisan Media with the Preference-Incorporating Choice and Assignment Design [J].
De Benedictis-Kessner, Justin ;
Baum, Matthew A. ;
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Yamamoto, Teppei .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2019, 113 (04) :902-916