Corporate Competing Culture and Environmental Investment

被引:12
作者
Tian, Jinfang [1 ]
Cao, Wei [1 ]
Cheng, Qian [1 ]
Huang, Yikun [2 ]
Hu, Shiyang [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Stat, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] China Agr Univ, Sch Publ Affairs Adm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Univ, Sch Econ & Business Adm, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 12卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
competing culture; environmental investment; internal control quality; corporate sustainable development; MD&A; PERFORMANCE; SHAREHOLDERS; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.774173
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Using Chinese listed companies as research setting, this paper constructs a measure of corporate competing culture through textual analysis on firms' management discussion and analysis (MD&A) disclosures, and examines the impact of corporate competing culture on environmental investment. The results show that competing culture has a significant and positive impact on firms' environmental investment, and the results remain robust to a battery of robustness tests. Moreover, the mediating analysis indicates that competing culture promotes corporate environmental investment through enhancing firms' internal control quality. Furthermore, the heterogeneity results show that the positive impact of corporate competing culture on environmental investment is more pronounced in firms with larger size, stronger corporate governance, in high-polluting industry, and located in less developed regions. Our findings shed light on the importance of corporate competing culture and provide practical implications for corporate sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Incomplete Contracts and the Internal Organization of Firms
    Aghion, Phillipe
    Bloom, Nicholas
    Van Reenen, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2014, 30 : 37 - 63
  • [2] Corporate social responsibility and CSR fit as predictors of corporate reputation: A global perspective
    Aksak, Emel Ozdora
    Ferguson, Mary Ann
    Duman, Sirin Atakan
    [J]. PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2016, 42 (01) : 79 - 81
  • [3] Does corporate R&D investment affect firm environmental performance? Evidence from G-6 countries
    Alam, Md. Samsul
    Atif, Muhammad
    Chien-Chi, Chu
    Soytas, Ugur
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 78 : 401 - 411
  • [4] Corporate citizenship: Challenging the corporate centricity in corporate marketing
    Andersen, Sophie Esmann
    Johansen, Trine Susanne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 131 : 686 - 699
  • [5] Works councils and environmental investment: Theory and evidence from German panel data
    Askildsen, JE
    Jirjahn, U
    Smith, SC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2006, 60 (03) : 346 - 372
  • [6] Corporate environmental investments: A cross-national study on managerial decision making
    Azadegan, Arash
    Golara, Sina
    Kach, Andrew
    Mousavi, Nasim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2018, 199 : 47 - 64
  • [7] Novel entities and technologies: Environmental benefits and risks
    Bierbaum, Rosina
    Leonard, Sunday A.
    Rejeski, David
    Whaley, Christopher
    Barra, Ricardo O.
    Libre, Christina
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 105 : 134 - 143
  • [8] Chinese environmental accountability: Ancient beliefs, science and sustainability
    Birkin, Frank
    Margerison, John
    Monkhouse, Lien
    [J]. RESOURCES ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 3
  • [9] Corporate reputation and social sustainability in the early stages of start-ups: A theoretical model to match stakeholders' expectations through corporate social commitment
    Bruna, Maria Giuseppina
    Nicolo, Domenico
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 35
  • [10] Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field
    Buunk, Abraham P.
    Gibbons, Frederick X.
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2007, 102 (01) : 3 - 21