School effectiveness research: From a review of the criticism to recommendations for further development

被引:56
作者
Luyten, H [1 ]
Visscher, A [1 ]
Witziers, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Dept Educ Adm, Fac Educ Sci & Technol, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09243450500114884
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
School effectiveness research (SER) has flourished since the 1980s. In recent years, however, various authors have criticised several aspects of SER. A thorough review of recent criticism can serve as a good starting point for addressing the flaws of SER, where appropriate, thereby supporting its further development. This article begins by reviewing the criticism from different perspectives by discussing the political-ideological nature of SER, its theoretical limitations and the research methodology it applies. The review of each type of criticism is accompanied by a review of the recommendations that the critics propose for improving SER. We then proceed to present our views on each line of criticism and propose 5 avenues that we consider promising for the further development of SER.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 279
页数:31
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Abell P., 1991, RATIONAL CHOICE THEO
[2]  
Anderson Lorin W., 2000, SMALL CLASSES HELP T, P3
[3]  
ANGUS L, 1993, BRIT J SOCIOL EDUC, V14, P333, DOI 10.1080/0142569930140309
[4]  
Annevelink E, 2004, Class Size: Linking Teaching and Learning
[5]  
[Anonymous], TIJDSCHRIFT ONDERWIJ
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT HDB ED CHANGE
[7]  
[Anonymous], ED RES EVALUATION
[8]  
[Anonymous], CHANGING TEACHERS CH
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2000, INT HDB SCH EFFECTIV
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1998, BRIT J RACE ETHNICIT