Comparison of Self-Reported Empathy Levels among Dental Undergraduate Students in Northern India: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study

被引:5
作者
Saha, Sonali [1 ]
Narang, Ridhi [2 ]
Aggarwal, Vikram Pal [3 ]
Brinda, Godhi S. [4 ]
Kavita, Dhinsa [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Patel Post Grad Inst Dent & Med Sci, Dept Pedodont & Prevent Dent, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Adesh Inst Dent Sci & Res, Dept Publ Hlth Dent, Bathinda, Punjab, India
[3] Surendra Dent Coll & Res Inst, Dept Publ Hlth Dent, Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India
[4] JSS Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Pedodont & Prevent Dent, Mysore, Karnataka, India
关键词
Communication; dental education; dental students; empathy; Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Health Profession Students; PHYSICIAN EMPATHY; GENDER; PSYCHOMETRICS;
D O I
10.4103/ccd.ccd_744_20
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Context: Empathy is one of the fundamentals of communication relevant within the practice of dentistry, and the research is limited in this field. Aims: The present study was conducted to assess the self-reported empathy levels among dental undergraduate students in Lucknow city of Northern India. Settings and Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among three dental colleges of Lucknow city during July 2019-September 2019. Subjects and Methods: E-survey link was circulated among 790 students through e-mails. It has two parts. The first part included sociodemographic information, wherein the second part, the empathy level of students was assessed using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy-Health Profession Students Version Questionnaire. The possible score range is 20-140: the higher the mean score, the higher the self-reported empathy level. Statistical Analysis Used: The data collected were analyzed using SPSS software version 24. Chi-square test was used to test gender distribution differences among different years. One-way analysis of variance including post hoc tests was used to compare the differences between study variables. Results: The mean +/- standard deviation empathy score was 92.55 +/- 11.85, 91.85 +/- 12.23, 93.25 +/- 11.24, 93.37 +/- 12.31, and 88.34 +/- 12.01 among the first-year, second-year, third-year, final-year, and interns' students, respectively, with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: It can be concluded from the results of the present study that the mean empathy score was highest among final-year students which is suggestive of the impact of education in behavioral sciences.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 258
页数:4
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Aggarwal Vikram Pal, 2016, Dent Res J (Isfahan), V13, P419
  • [2] Asokan Sharath, 2017, J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent, V35, P2, DOI 10.4103/0970-4388.199225
  • [3] An assessment of dental students' empathy levels in Malaysia
    Babar, Muneer G.
    Omar, Hanan
    Lim, Lee P.
    Khan, Saad A.
    Mitha, Shahid
    Ahmad, Siti F. B.
    Hasan, Syed S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2013, 4 : 223 - 229
  • [4] Boyle M., 2009, Internet J. Med. Educ, V1, P1
  • [5] Let me see if I have this right ...: Words that help build empathy
    Coulehan, JL
    Platt, FW
    Egener, B
    Frankel, R
    Lin, CT
    Lown, B
    Salazar, WH
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 135 (03) : 221 - 227
  • [6] Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review
    Di Blasi, Z
    Harkness, E
    Ernst, E
    Georgiou, A
    Kleijnen, J
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9258) : 757 - 762
  • [7] The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: Preliminary Psychometrics and Group Comparisons in Italian Physicians
    Di Lillo, Mariangela
    Cicchetti, Americo
    Lo Scalzo, Alessandra
    Taroni, Francesco
    Hojat, Mohammadreza
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2009, 84 (09) : 1198 - 1202
  • [8] Diaz Narvaez., 2015, Health, V7, P1527, DOI [10.4236/health.2015.711166, DOI 10.4236/HEALTH.2015.711166]
  • [9] Diaz-Narvaez VP., 2016, HEALTH, V8, P32, DOI DOI 10.4236/HEALTH.2016.81005
  • [10] Gouthami Datta Gouthami Datta, 2016, International Journal of Medicine and Public Health, V6, P113, DOI 10.5530/ijmedph.2016.3.3