Modeling the Spatial Distribution of Debris Flows and Analysis of the Controlling Factors: A Machine Learning Approach

被引:22
作者
Zhao, Yan [1 ]
Meng, Xingmin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Qi, Tianjun [4 ]
Chen, Guan [1 ]
Li, Yajun [1 ]
Yue, Dongxia [4 ]
Qing, Feng [4 ]
机构
[1] Lanzhou Univ, Sch Earth Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[2] Gansu Tech Innovat Ctr Environm Geol & Geohazard, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[3] Int Sci & Technol Cooperat Base Geohazards Monito, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
[4] Lanzhou Univ, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Lanzhou 730000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
debris flow; spatial distribution; controlling factor; machine learning; CHI-CHI-EARTHQUAKE; GANSU PROVINCE; RAINFALL; MAGNITUDE; FREQUENCY; LANDSLIDES; VEGETATION; TERRAIN; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.3390/rs13234813
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Debris flows are a major geological hazard in mountainous regions. For improving mitigation, it is important to study the spatial distribution and factors controlling debris flows. In the Bailong River Basin, central China, landslides and debris flows are very well developed due to the large differences in terrain, the complex geological environment, and concentrated rainfall. For analysis, 52 influencing factors, statistical, machine learning, remote sensing and GIS methods were used to analyze the spatial distribution and controlling factors of 652 debris flow catchments with different frequencies. The spatial distribution of these catchments was divided into three zones according to their differences in debris flow frequencies. A comprehensive analysis of the relationship between various factors and debris flows was made. Through parameter optimization and feature selection, the Extra Trees classifier performed the best, with an accuracy of 95.6%. The results show that lithology was the most important factor controlling debris flows in the study area (with a contribution of 26%), followed by landslide density and factors affecting slope stability (road density, fault density and peak ground acceleration, with a total contribution of 30%). The average annual frequency of daily rainfall > 20 mm was the most important triggering factor (with a contribution of 7%). Forest area and vegetation cover were also important controlling factors (with a total contribution of 9%), and they should be regarded as an important component of debris flow mitigation measures. The results are helpful to improve the understanding of factors influencing debris flows and provide a reference for the formulation of mitigation measures.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLING FACTORS FOR HYDRAULIC FRACTURING PARAMETERS AND ACCUMULATED PRODUCTION USING MACHINE LEARNING
    Zhu, Zhihua
    Hsu, Maoya
    Li, Chang
    Dai, Jiacheng
    Xie, Bobo
    Ma, Zhengchao
    Wang, Tianyu
    Li, Jie
    Tian, Shouceng
    THERMAL SCIENCE, 2024, 28 (2A): : 1155 - 1160
  • [32] An improved machine learning approach for predicting granular flows
    Xu, Dan
    Shen, Yansong
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 450
  • [33] Debris flows analysis through quantitative evaluation of soil depth distribution under limited data
    Lee, Seungjun
    An, Hyunuk
    Kim, Minseok
    Lee, Daeeop
    Lee, Jaeuk
    CATENA, 2024, 246
  • [34] A study on hydrodynamics of rigid and emergent vegetated flows using machine learning approach
    Maji, Soumen
    Senapati, Apurbalal
    Mondal, Arunendu
    INNOVATIONS IN SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2025, 21 (01) : 271 - 278
  • [35] A comparative machine learning approach to identify landslide triggering factors in northern Chilean Patagonia
    Morales, Bastian
    Lizama, Elizabet
    Somos-Valenzuela, Marcelo A.
    Lillo-Saavedra, Mario
    Chen, Ningsheng
    Fustos, Ivo
    LANDSLIDES, 2021, 18 (08) : 2767 - 2784
  • [36] Machine learning for RANS turbulence modeling of variable property flows
    Sanhueza, Rafael Diez
    Smit, Stephan H. H. J.
    Peeters, Jurriaan W. R.
    Pecnik, Rene
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2023, 255
  • [37] Machine learning accelerated discrete element modeling of granular flows
    Lu, Liqiang
    Gao, Xi
    Dietiker, Jean-Francois
    Shahnam, Mehrdad
    Rogers, William A.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2021, 245
  • [38] Modeling Climate Change Effects on the Distribution of Oak Forests with Machine Learning
    Mirhashemi, Hengameh
    Heydari, Mehdi
    Karami, Omid
    Ahmadi, Kourosh
    Mosavi, Amir
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (03):
  • [39] Spatial Modeling of Maritime Risk Using Machine Learning
    Rawson, Andrew
    Brito, Mario
    Sabeur, Zoheir
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2022, 42 (10) : 2291 - 2311
  • [40] Assessing the impacts of urban morphological factors on urban building energy modeling based on spatial proximity analysis and explainable machine learning
    Li, Zheng
    Ma, Jun
    Jiang, Feifeng
    Zhang, Shengkai
    Tan, Yi
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 85