Improving TOPMODEL performance in rainfall-runoff simulating based on ANN

被引:0
作者
Xu, Jingwen [1 ]
Liu, Yonghe [2 ]
Zhao, Junfang [3 ]
Tang, Tian [1 ]
Xie, Xingmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Yaan 625014, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Key Lab Regional Climate Environm Res Temp East A, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, CMA, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
来源
2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DISPLAY AND PHOTONICS | 2010年 / 7749卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Baohe River basin; Artificial Neural Network; rainfall-runoff model; TOPMODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
TOPMODEL is a simple physically based rainfall-runoff model and has become increasingly popular and widely used in various applications in recent years. However, it performs worse than the Artificial Neural Network (ANN)-based rainfall-runoff models in stream flow prediction. In order to overcome this weakness inherent in TOPMODEL, a new approach based on ANN and TOPMODEL is proposed in the present study. The present approach uses the output of an ANN-based rainfall-runoff model in validation period as the 'observed discharge' to calibrate the parameters of TOPMODEL. The calibrated TOPMODEL is then directly employed for stream flow prediction, rather than experienced traditional two stages: calibration period and validation period. To test the new method, Baohe River basin (2413 km(2)), located at the upper stream of the Hanjiang Catchment in Yangtze River Basin, China, is selected as the study area. The results show that the daily stream flows simulated by the new approach are in general agreement with the observed ones, while the daily stream flows simulated by the traditional one, i.e. only using TOPMODEL for stream flow predictions, greatly overestimates some peak flows. And the new method resulted in a Nash and Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient value of 0.764, which is significantly larger than that of the traditional one, which suggests that the new approach combining the advantages of ANN and TOPMODEL is more suitable for daily stream flow forecasting.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Abrahart RJ, 2000, HYDROL PROCESS, V14, P2157, DOI 10.1002/1099-1085(20000815/30)14:11/12<2157::AID-HYP57>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation
[4]  
Beven K.J., 1979, Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, V24, P43, DOI DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834
[5]   HOW MUCH COMPLEXITY IS WARRANTED IN A RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODEL [J].
JAKEMAN, AJ ;
HORNBERGER, GM .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1993, 29 (08) :2637-2649
[6]  
Nash J. E., 1970, Journal of Hydrology, V10, P282, DOI DOI 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
[7]   Application of neural approaches to one-step daily flow forecasting in Portuguese watersheds [J].
Pulido-Calvo, Inmaculada ;
Portela, Maria Manuela .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 332 (1-2) :1-15
[8]   Forecasting daily streamflow using hybrid ANN models [J].
Wang, Wen ;
Van Gelder, Pieter H. A. J. M. ;
Vrijling, J. K. ;
Ma, Jun .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 324 (1-4) :383-399
[9]  
Wolock D., 1993, Simulating the variable-source-area concept of stream ow generation with the watershed model TOPMODEL