Follow-up after intraoperative sentinel node biopsy of N0 neck oral cancer patients

被引:27
|
作者
Terada, Akihiro [2 ]
Hasegawa, Yasuhisa [1 ]
Yatabe, Yasushi [3 ]
Hanai, Nobuhiro [1 ]
Ozawa, Taijiro [1 ]
Hirakawa, Hitoshi [1 ]
Maruo, Takashi [4 ]
Kawakita, Daisuke [5 ]
Mikami, Shinji [6 ]
Suzuki, Atsushi [1 ]
Miyazaki, Takuya [1 ]
Nakashima, Tsutomu [4 ]
机构
[1] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Head & Neck Surg, Chikusa Ku, Aichi 4648681, Japan
[2] Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nakamura Ku, Nagoya, Aichi 4538511, Japan
[3] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Pathol & Mol Diagnost, Chikusa Ku, Aichi 4648681, Japan
[4] Nagoya Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Sch Med, Showa Ku, Aichi 4668550, Japan
[5] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Div Epidemiol & Prevent, Chikusa Ku, Aichi 4648681, Japan
[6] Nara Med Univ, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nara 6348521, Japan
关键词
Oral cancer; Sentinel node; Recurrence; False negative; Prognosis; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LYMPH-NODE; FROZEN-SECTION; HEAD; MELANOMA; RADIOLOCALIZATION; FEASIBILITY; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-010-1364-2
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to evaluate the validity of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in early oral cancer patients focusing on the accuracy of intraoperative diagnoses of SN status, recurrences in follow-up and impact on patient survival. Previously untreated N0 oral cancer patients were candidates for the study. Using a radioisotope method, an intraoperative SN biopsy was performed. Patients with a positive frozen section of SN underwent immediate neck dissection as a single-stage procedure; they were followed in our outpatient clinic. Forty-five cT1-2N0 patients with squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed. There were seven patients with positive SN, five of whom were detected by intraoperative frozen section analysis. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the intraoperative frozen section analysis of SN were 71.4, 100 and 95.6%, respectively. There were 13 recurrences in the course of all patients treated. Those with positive SN showed a tendency toward recurrence. Three patients with negative SN suffered from delayed ipsilateral neck recurrence. These were considered false negatives at a rate of 7.9%. The 5-year overall survival rate of all patients was 91.1%. SN-positive patient survival was significantly poorer than that of SN-negative patients. Positive SN had a negative impact on the survival. SN biopsy was shown to be a valuable method for determining the neck status of early oral cancer patients. The concordance rate of intraoperative multislice frozen section analysis of SN and patient neck status at the time of operation was 95.6%. SN-positive patients exhibited a tendency toward cancer recurrence. There were three cases of false negatives not conforming to the SN concept and their rate was 7.9%. Positive SN had a negative impact on patient survival.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 435
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 5-year follow-up of sentinel node negative breast cancer patients
    de Kanter, AY
    Menke-Pluymers, MM
    Wouters, MWJM
    Burgmans, I
    van Geel, AN
    Eggermont, AMM
    EJSO, 2006, 32 (03): : 282 - 286
  • [22] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in clinically N0 T1-T2 staged oral cancer: The Dutch multicenter trial
    Flach, Geke B.
    Bloemena, E.
    Klop, W. Martin C.
    van Es, Robert J. J.
    Schepman, Kees-Pieter
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Castelijns, Jonas A.
    Leemans, C. Rene
    de Bree, Remco
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 50 (10) : 1020 - 1024
  • [23] N0 neck trial: Does intensification of follow-up (Ultrasound plus Physical Examination) influence outcomes in early-stage oral cancer?
    Vaish, Richa
    Hawaldar, Rohini
    Gupta, Sudeep
    Dandekar, Mitali
    Shah, Snehal
    Chaukar, Devendra
    Pantvaidya, Gouri
    Deshmukh, Anuja
    Chaturvedi, Pankaj
    Pai, Prathamesh
    Nair, Deepa
    Nair, Sudhir
    Thakur, Meenakshi
    Ghosh-Laskar, Sarbani
    Agarwal, J. P.
    D'Cruz, Anil K.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 204
  • [24] Cutaneous melanoma: Medical specialists' opinions on follow-up and sentinel lymph node biopsy
    Wevers, K. P.
    Hoekstra-Weebers, J. E. H. M.
    Speijers, M. J.
    Bergman, W.
    Gruis, N. A.
    Hoekstra, H. J.
    EJSO, 2014, 40 (10): : 1276 - 1283
  • [25] Review and evaluation of sentinel node procedures in 250 melanoma patients with a median follow-up of 6 years
    Estourgie, SH
    Nieweg, OE
    Olmos, RAV
    Hoefnagel, CA
    Kroon, BBR
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (06) : 681 - 688
  • [26] Review and Evaluation of Sentinel Node Procedures in 250 Melanoma Patients With a Median Follow-Up of 6 Years
    Susanne H. Estourgie
    Omgo E. Nieweg
    Renato A. Valdés Olmos
    Cornelis A. Hoefnagel
    Bin B. R. Kroon
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2003, 10 : 681 - 688
  • [27] Sentinel lymph node mapping of clinically N0 early oral cancer: a diagnostic pitfall on CT lymphography
    Sugiyama, Satomi
    IWai, Toshinori
    Izumi, Toshiharu
    Baba, Junichi
    Oguri, Senri
    Hirota, Makoto
    Mitsudo, Kenji
    ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 37 (02) : 251 - 255
  • [28] Role of methylene blue dye in sentinel node biopsy in N0 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma
    Upadhyay, Kiran
    Gupta, Vikas
    Sahu, Pankaj K.
    Basu, Abhijit
    Bhatia, Ritika
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2024, 61 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [29] Incidence of axillary recurrence in 344 sentinel node negative breast cancer patients after intermediate follow-up - A prospective study into the accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients
    Heuts, E. M.
    van der Ent, E. W. C.
    Hulsewe, K. W. E.
    Heeren, R. A. M.
    Hoofwijk, A. G. M.
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2008, 108 (02) : 203 - 207
  • [30] Neck restaging with sentinel node biopsy in T1-T2N0 oral and oropharyngeal cancer: Why and how?
    Burcia, Vincent
    Costes, Valerie
    Faillie, Jean Luc
    Gardiner, Quentin
    de Verbizier, Delphine
    Cartier, Cesar
    Jouzdani, Elham
    Crampette, Louis
    Guerrier, Bernard
    Garrel, Renaud
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2010, 142 (04) : 592 - 597