Clinical Prognostic Factors for Patients With Esophageal Cancer Treated With Definitive Chemoradiotherapy

被引:6
|
作者
Favareto, Sergio L. [1 ]
Sousa, Cecilia F. [1 ]
Pinto, Pedro J. [1 ]
Ramos, Henderson [1 ]
Chen, Michael J. [1 ]
Castro, Douglas G. [1 ]
Silva, Maria L. [1 ]
Gondim, Guilherme [1 ]
Pellizzon, Antonio Cassio A. [1 ]
Fogaroli, Ricardo C. [1 ]
机构
[1] AC Camargo Canc Ctr, Radiat Oncol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
radical treatment; overall survival; progression-free survival; chemoradiotherapy; esophageal cancer; SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; PHASE-II; CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; TUMOR LENGTH; LYMPH-NODES; CHEMORADIATION; CISPLATIN; SURGERY;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.18894
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Treatment with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the best option for patients with locally advanced esophageal tumors considered unresectable or for patients without clinical conditions to undergo surgical treatment. Technological advances in radiotherapy in the last decades have made treatment more accurate with less toxicity, and the association with more effective systemic treatment has been gradually improving survival rates. Aim Evaluate clinical prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (ChT). Material and methods The clinical records of 60 patients treated from April 2011 until December 2019 with esophageal cancer considered unresectable and/or without clinical conditions for surgery, treated with definitive CRT, were analyzed. All patients had upper digestive endoscopy (UDE) with positive biopsy, neck, chest, and abdominal CT scan, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography (PET-CT). Patients were followed with physical examination and CTs every three months in the first and second years and every six months from the third year of follow-up. UDE was made every three to six months after the end of the treatment or in suspicion of tumor recurrence. PET-CT was also performed in the follow-up when clinically necessary. Local and regional failure (LRF) was defined as abnormalities in the image tests within the planning target volume (PTV) and/or positive biopsy on UDE. Any other failure was defined as a distant failure (DF). PFS was defined in the record of the first tumor recurrence site and OS in the death record from the date of the start of treatment. Results The median age of the patients was 66 years (range: 33 to 83 years) and 46 patients (76.7%) were male. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) was the most frequent histological type (85%). Most patients had tumors located in the mid-thoracic esophagus (53.3%) and stage III or IV (59.9%). All patients were treated using 3D (76.7%) or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT; 23.3%). The median total dose was 50.4Gy (41.4-50.4). All patients received platinum-based ChT concomitant with RT. The most common regimen used was carboplatin and paclitaxel, with a median of five cycles. With a median follow-up of 19 months, the median PFS and OS were 10 and 20 months, respectively. LRF and DF as the first site of failure were observed in 22 (36.6%) and 26 (43.3%) patients, respectively. In the univariate analysis, tumor length lower than 2.6 cm, gross tumor volume (GTV) volume lower than 28 cm(3), clinical tumor stages T1 and T2, clinical node stage N0, clinical prognostic stage groups I and II, and complete response to treatment, were statistically significant factors for better PFS and OS. In the multivariate analysis, the presence of clinical nodal stage N0 was related to better PFS (p=0.02). Conclusion Node clinical status was the most important clinical factor for PFS. Despite all the technical progress observed in radiotherapy, treatments concomitant with platinum-based chemotherapy are associated with high levels of LRF and DF. New strategies in systemic therapy and radiotherapy are necessary for improving outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The prognostic value of haematologic parameter changes during treatment in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy
    Yildirim, Berna A.
    Guler, Ozan Cem
    Kose, Fatih
    Onal, Cem
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 39 (05) : 695 - 701
  • [32] The impact of histology on recurrence patterns in esophageal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy
    Xi, Mian
    Xu, Cai
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Hofstetter, Wayne L.
    Murphy, Mariela Blum
    Maru, Dipen M.
    Bhutani, Manoop S.
    Lee, Jeffrey H.
    Weston, Brian
    Komaki, Ritsuko
    Lin, Steven H.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 124 (02) : 318 - 324
  • [33] Definitive Chemoradiotherapy Compared to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Esophagectomy for Locoregional Esophageal Cancer: National Population-based Cohort Study
    Kamarajah, Sivesh K.
    Phillips, Alexander W.
    Hanna, George B.
    Low, Donald
    Markar, Sheraz R.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2022, 275 (03) : 526 - 533
  • [34] Esophageal bypass in two patients with a complete response after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer
    Watanabe, Yukihiro
    Sato, Hiroshi
    Takase, Kenichiro
    Takeshita, Hiroki
    Sakuramoto, Shinichi
    Niihara, Masahiro
    Tsubosa, Yasuhiro
    Koyama, Isamu
    ESOPHAGUS, 2015, 12 (03) : 316 - 321
  • [35] Comparison Between Esophagectomy and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer
    Wang, Bing-Yen
    Hung, Wei-Heng
    Wu, Shiao-Chi
    Chen, Heng-Chung
    Huang, Chang-Lun
    Lin, Ching-Hsiung
    Chen, Hui-Shan
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 107 (04) : 1060 - 1067
  • [36] Gross tumor volume is the prognostic factor for squamous cell esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy
    Chen, Yun
    Zhang, Zhen
    Jiang, Guoliang
    Zhao, Kuaile
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (06) : 1155 - 1161
  • [37] Prognostic Impact of Postoperative Complications following Salvage Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer after Definitive Chemoradiotherapy
    Sugimura, Keijiro
    Miyata, Hiroshi
    Shinno, Naoki
    Ushigome, Hajime
    Asukai, Kei
    Hara, Hisashi
    Hasegawa, Shinichiro
    Yamada, Daisaku
    Yamamoto, Kazuyoshi
    Haraguchi, Naotsugu
    Nishimura, Junichi
    Motoori, Masaaki
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Takahashi, Hidenori
    Yasui, Masayoshi
    Omori, Takeshi
    Ohue, Masayuki
    Yano, Masahiko
    ONCOLOGY, 2020, 98 (05) : 280 - 288
  • [38] Definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma: An alternative to surgery?
    Tougeron, D.
    Scotte, M.
    Hamidou, H.
    Di Fiore, F.
    Paillot, B.
    Michot, F.
    Michel, P.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 105 (08) : 761 - 766
  • [39] Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in esophageal carcinoma patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy
    Yildirim, Berna A.
    Torun, Nese
    Guler, Ozan C.
    Onal, Cem
    NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2018, 39 (06) : 553 - 563
  • [40] Addition of Induction or Consolidation Chemotherapy in Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Alone for Patients With Unresectable Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wang, Jianing
    Xiao, Linlin
    Wang, Shuai
    Pang, Qingsong
    Wang, Jun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11