Professors Who Signal a Fixed Mindset About Ability Undermine Women's Performance in STEM

被引:55
作者
Canning, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Ozier, Elise [2 ]
Williams, Heidi E. [2 ]
AlRasheed, Rashed [3 ]
Murphy, Mary C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Psychol, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
lay theories; mindset; women in STEM; stereotype threat; STEREOTYPE THREAT; MATH; MOTIVATION; ATTITUDES; SCIENCE; PACKAGE; POWER;
D O I
10.1177/19485506211030398
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Two studies investigate how science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) professors' fixed mindsets-the belief that intelligence is fixed and unchangeable-may induce stereotype threat and undermine women's performance. In an experiment (N = 217), we manipulated professors' mindset beliefs (fixed vs. growth) within a course syllabus. While both men and women perceived the fixed mindset professor to endorse more gender stereotypes and anticipated feeling less belonging in the course, women reported these effects more than men. However, only for women did this threat undermine performance. In a 2-year longitudinal field study (884 students enrolled in 46 STEM courses), students who perceived their professor to endorse a fixed (vs. growth) mindset thought the professor would endorse more gender stereotypes and experienced less belonging in those courses. However, only women's grades in those courses suffered as a result. Together, these studies demonstrate that professors' fixed mindset beliefs may trigger stereotype threat among women in STEM courses.
引用
收藏
页码:927 / 937
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[2]   STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes [J].
Canning, Elizabeth A. ;
Muenks, Katherine ;
Green, Dorainne J. ;
Murphy, Mary C. .
SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2019, 5 (02)
[3]   Ambient Belonging: How Stereotypical Cues Impact Gender Participation in Computer Science [J].
Cheryan, Sapna ;
Plaut, Victoria C. ;
Davies, Paul G. ;
Steele, Claude M. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 97 (06) :1045-1060
[4]   Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review [J].
Covington, MV .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 51 :171-200
[5]  
Dweck C. S., 2000, SELF THEORIES THEIR
[6]   A SOCIAL COGNITIVE APPROACH TO MOTIVATION AND PERSONALITY [J].
DWECK, CS ;
LEGGETT, EL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (02) :256-273
[7]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[8]   Parents think their sons are brighter than their daughters: Sex differences in parental self-estimations and estimations of their children's multiple intelligences [J].
Furnham, A ;
Reeves, E ;
Budhani, S .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 163 (01) :24-39
[9]  
Hayes A. F., 2017, INTRO MEDIATION MODE, DOI DOI 10.1111/JEDM.12050
[10]  
Hill C., 2010, Why so few?: women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics