Electromyography-Based Gesture Recognition: Is It Time to Change Focus From the Forearm to the Wrist?

被引:91
作者
Botros, Fady S. [1 ,2 ]
Phinyomark, Angkoon [2 ]
Scheme, Erik J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Brunswick, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
[2] Univ New Brunswick, Inst Biomed Engn, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Electromyography; Wrist; Muscles; Electrodes; Gesture recognition; Wearable computers; Prosthetics; Electromyography (EMG); finger gestures; forearm; gesture recognition; hand gestures; human-computer interaction (HCI); muscle-computer interface; myoelectric control; wearables; wrist; SURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; EMG; CROSSTALK; MUSCLES; HAND;
D O I
10.1109/TII.2020.3041618
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Despite a historical focus on prosthetics, the incorporation of electromyography (EMG) sensors into less obtrusive wearable designs has recently gained attention as a potential human-computer interaction scheme for general consumer use. Because consumers are more used to wrist-worn devices, this article presents a comprehensive and systematic investigation of the feasibility of hand gesture recognition using EMG signals recorded at the wrist. A direct comparison of signal and information quality is conducted between concurrently recorded wrist and forearm signals. Both signals were collected simultaneously from 21 subjects while they performed a selection of 17 different single-finger gestures, multifinger gestures, and wrist gestures. Wrist EMG signals yielded consistently higher (p < 0.05) signal quality metrics than forearm signals for gestures that involved fine finger movements, while maintaining comparable quality for wrist gestures. Similarly, the performance of both individual state-of-the-art EMG features and a standard feature set was found to be significantly better when using wrist signals for single and multifinger gestures, and comparable for wrist gestures. Classifiers trained and tested using wrist EMG signals achieved average accuracy levels of 92.1% for single-finger gestures, 91.2% for multifinger gestures, and 94.7% for the conventional wrist gestures. In conclusion, this article clearly demonstrates the feasibility of using wrist EMG signals for hand gesture recognition. Results highlight not only the promise of this approach, but also the viability of incorporating prior knowledge from the prosthetics field in the design of wrist-based EMG pattern recognition systems.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 184
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   A Review of Wrist-Worn Wearable: Sensors, Models, and Challenges [J].
Al-Eidan, Rasha M. ;
Al-Khalifa, Hend ;
Al-Salman, Abdul Malik .
JOURNAL OF SENSORS, 2018, 2018
[2]  
Al-Jumaily A., 2009, IIWAS2009, P582, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1806338.1806448, 10.1145/1806338.1806448]
[3]   Identification of EMG signals using discriminant analysis and SVM classifier [J].
Alkan, Ahmet ;
Gunay, Mucahid .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (01) :44-47
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, 2013 IEEE AEROSPACE, DOI DOI 10.1109/AERO.2013.6497171
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, EuroITV'12, page
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, P 27 ANN ACM S US IN, DOI DOI 10.1145/2642918.2647396
[7]   Air-Guitar Hero: a real-time video game interface for training and evaluation of dexterous upper-extremity neuroprosthetic control algorithms [J].
Armiger, Robert S. ;
Vogelstein, R. Jacob .
2008 IEEE BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS CONFERENCE - INTELLIGENT BIOMEDICAL SYSTEMS (BIOCAS), 2008, :121-124
[8]  
Benalcázar ME, 2017, EUR SIGNAL PR CONF, P1040, DOI 10.23919/EUSIPCO.2017.8081366
[9]   Evaluation of the forearm EMG signal features for the control of a prosthetic hand [J].
Boostani, R ;
Moradi, MH .
PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 24 (02) :309-319
[10]   Interpreting principal components in biomechanics: Representative extremes and single component reconstruction [J].
Brandon, Scott C. E. ;
Graham, Ryan B. ;
Almosnino, Sivan ;
Sadler, Erin M. ;
Stevenson, Joan M. ;
Deluzio, Kevin J. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (06) :1304-1310