Effectiveness and cost of multilayered colorectal cancer screening promotion interventions at federally qualified health centers in Washington State

被引:30
作者
Kemper, Kathryn E. [1 ]
Glaze, Becky L. [1 ]
Eastman, Casey L. [2 ]
Waldron, Roxane C. [2 ]
Hoover, Sonja [3 ]
Flagg, T'Ronda [4 ]
Tangka, Florence K. L. [4 ]
Subramanian, Sujha [3 ]
机构
[1] HealthPoint, 955 Powell Ave SW, Renton, WA 98057 USA
[2] Washington State Dept Hlth, Tumwater, WA USA
[3] RTI Int, Waltham, MA USA
[4] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Canc Prevent & Control, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
cancer screening; colorectal cancer; community health centers; health care economics and organizations; reminder system; Washington; BARRIERS; COLONOSCOPY; OUTREACH; LESSONS; TESTS;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.31693
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background It has been demonstrated that fecal immunochemical test (FIT) mailing programs are effective for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The objectives of the current study were to assess the magnitude of uptake that could be achieved with a mailed FIT program in a federally qualified health center and whether such a program can be implemented at a reasonable cost to support sustainability. Methods The Washington State Department of Health's partner HealthPoint implemented a direct-mail FIT program at 9 medical clinics, along with a follow-up reminder letter and automated telephone calls to those not up-to-date with recommended screening. Supplemental outreach events at selected medical clinics and a 50th birthday card screening reminder program also were implemented. The authors collected and analyzed process, effectiveness, and cost measures and conducted a systematic assessment of the short-term cost effectiveness of the interventions. Results Overall, 5178 FIT kits were mailed with 4009 follow-up reminder letters, and 8454 automated reminder telephone calls were made over 12 months. In total, 1607 FIT kits were returned within 3 months of the end of the implementation period: an overall return rate of 31% for the mailed FIT program. The average total intervention cost per FIT kit returned was $39.81, and the intervention implementation cost per kit returned was $18.76. Conclusions The mailed FIT intervention improved CRC screening uptake among HealthPoint's patient population. This intervention was implemented for less than $40 per individual successfully screened. The findings and lessons learned can assist other clinics that serve disadvantaged populations to increase their CRC screening adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:4121 / 4129
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Literacy Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Community Clinics [J].
Arnold, Connie L. ;
Rademaker, Alfred ;
Bailey, Stacy Cooper ;
Esparza, Julia M. ;
Reynolds, Cristalyn ;
Liu, Dachao ;
Platt, Daci ;
Davis, Terry C. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2012, 17 :252-264
[2]   Screening for Colorectal Cancer US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement [J].
Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten ;
Grossman, David C. ;
Curry, Susan J. ;
Davidson, Karina W. ;
Epling, John W., Jr. ;
Garcia, Francisco A. R. ;
Gillman, Matthew W. ;
Harper, Diane M. ;
Kemper, Alex R. ;
Krist, Alex H. ;
Kurth, Ann E. ;
Landefeld, C. Seth ;
Mangione, Carol M. ;
Owens, Douglas K. ;
Phillips, William R. ;
Phipps, Maureen G. ;
Pignone, Michael P. ;
Siu, Albert L. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 315 (23) :2564-2575
[3]   Reasons for non-response to a direct-mailed FIT kit program: lessons learned from a pragmatic colorectal-cancer screening study in a federally sponsored health center [J].
Coronado, Gloria D. ;
Schneider, Jennifer L. ;
Sanchez, Jennifer J. ;
Petrik, Amanda F. ;
Green, Beverly .
TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2015, 5 (01) :60-67
[4]   Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes [J].
Coronado, Gloria D. ;
Vollmer, William M. ;
Petrik, Amanda ;
Aguirre, Josue ;
Kapka, Tanya ;
DeVoe, Jennifer ;
Puro, Jon ;
Tran Miers ;
Lembach, Jennifer ;
Turner, Ann ;
Sanchez, Jennifer ;
Retecki, Sally ;
Nelson, Christine ;
Green, Beverly .
BMC CANCER, 2014, 14
[5]   Advantages of Wordless Instructions on How to Complete a Fecal Immunochemical Test: Lessons from Patient Advisory Council Members of a Federally Qualified Health Center [J].
Coronado, Gloria D. ;
Sanchez, Jen ;
Petrik, Amanda ;
Kapka, Tanya ;
DeVoe, Jen ;
Green, Beverly .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2014, 29 (01) :86-90
[6]   The Effects of Test Preference, Test Access, and Navigation on Colorectal Cancer Screening [J].
Daskalakis, Constantine ;
Vernon, Sally W. ;
Sifri, Randa ;
DiCarlo, Melissa ;
Cocroft, James ;
Sendecki, Jocelyn Andrel ;
Myers, Ronald E. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2014, 23 (08) :1521-1528
[7]   Feasibility and efficacy of pairing fecal immunochemical testing with mammography for increasing colorectal cancer screening among uninsured Latinas in northern Manhattan [J].
Hillyer, Grace Clarke ;
Basch, Charles E. ;
Schmitt, Karen M. ;
Neugut, Alfred I. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 53 (03) :194-198
[8]   Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening A Mixed-Methods Analysis [J].
Jones, Resa M. ;
Devers, Kelly J. ;
Kuzel, Anton J. ;
Woolf, Steven H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (05) :508-516
[9]   Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Vietnamese Americans: A Qualitative Analysis [J].
Kimura, Amanda ;
Sin, Mo-Kyung ;
Spigner, Clarence ;
Tran, Anh ;
Tu, Shin-Ping .
JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION, 2014, 29 (04) :728-734
[10]   Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Tests Plus Educational Materials to Improve Colon Cancer Screening Rates in Iowa Research Network (IRENE) Practices [J].
Levy, Barcey T. ;
Daly, Jeanette M. ;
Xu, Yinghui ;
Ely, John W. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2012, 25 (01) :73-82