Use of an artificial intelligence-based rule extraction approach to predict an emergency cesarean section

被引:5
作者
Nagayasu, Yoko [1 ]
Fujita, Daisuke [1 ]
Ohmichi, Masahide [1 ]
Hayashi, Yoichi [2 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka 5690801, Japan
[2] Meiji Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
artificial intelligence; delivery; emergency cesarean section; predictive decision system; rule extraction; COHORT; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1002/ijgo.13888
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective One of the major problems with artificial intelligence (AI) is that it is generally known as a "black box". Therefore, the present study aimed to construct an emergency cesarean section (CS) prediction system using an AI-based rule extraction approach as a "white box" to detect the cause for the emergency CS. Methods Data were collected from all perinatal records of all delivery outcomes at Osaka Medical College between December 2014 and July 2019. We identified the delivery method for all deliveries after 36 gestational weeks as either (1) vaginal delivery or scheduled CS, or (2) emergency CS. From among these, we selected 52 risk factors to feed into an AI-based rule extraction algorithm to extract rules to predict an emergency CS. Results We identified 1513 singleton deliveries (1285 [84.9%] vaginal deliveries, 228 emergency CS [15.1%]) and extracted 15 rules. We achieved an average accuracy of 81.90% using five-fold cross-validation and an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve of 71.46%. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first study to use interpretable AI-based rule extraction technology to predict an emergency CS. This system appears to be useful for identifying hidden factors for emergency CS.
引用
收藏
页码:654 / 662
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Prediction of risk for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas: a comparison of neural network and multiple logistic regression models [J].
Al Housseini, Ali ;
Newman, Tondra ;
Cox, Alan ;
Devoe, Lawrence D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 201 (01) :113.e1-113.e6
[2]   Comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity between elective and emergency caesarean section in singleton-term breech presentation [J].
Anuwutnavin, Sanitra ;
Kitnithee, Benjamas ;
Chanprapaph, Pharuhas ;
Heamar, Suanya ;
Rongdech, Pimnara .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 40 (04) :500-506
[3]   Predictive modeling of emergency cesarean delivery [J].
Campillo-Artero, Carlos ;
Serra-Burriel, Miguel ;
Calvo-Perez, Andres .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01)
[4]   Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety [J].
Challen, Robert ;
Denny, Joshua ;
Pitt, Martin ;
Gompels, Luke ;
Edwards, Tom ;
Tsaneva-Atanasova, Krasimira .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2019, 28 (03) :231-237
[5]  
COHN J, 1985, LANCET, V2, P437
[6]  
Darnal Naveen, 2020, J Nepal Health Res Counc, V18, P186, DOI 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i2.2093
[7]   Maternal Factors Associated with Mode of Delivery in a Population with a High Cesarean Section Rate [J].
Gondwe, Tamala ;
Betha, Kalpana ;
Kusneniwar, G. N. ;
Bunker, Clareann H. ;
Tang, Gong ;
Simhan, Hyagriv ;
Reddy, P. S. ;
Haggerty, Catherine L. .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 9 (04) :252-258
[8]  
Hayashi Yoichi, 2015, Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, V1, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.imu.2015.12.003
[10]   High Accuracy-priority Rule Extraction for Reconciling Accuracy and Interpretability in Credit Scoring [J].
Hayashi, Yoichi ;
Oishi, Tatsuhiro .
NEW GENERATION COMPUTING, 2018, 36 (04) :393-418