Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy

被引:56
作者
Lewis, Celine [1 ,2 ]
Hill, Melissa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Skirton, Heather [4 ]
Chitty, Lyn S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] UCL Inst Child Hlth, Genet & Genom Med, Level 5 Barclay House,37 Queens Sq, London WC1N 3BH, England
[2] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, Level 5 Barclay House,37 Queens Sq, London, England
[3] Great Ormond St Hosp Children NHS Fdn Trust, North East Thames Reg Genet Serv, Level 5 Barclay House,37 Queens Sq, London, England
[4] Univ Plymouth, Fac Hlth & Human Sci, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
关键词
PREGNANT-WOMEN; DECISION-MAKING; DOWNS-SYNDROME; DIAGNOSIS; CONTEXT; TRIAL; CELL;
D O I
10.1038/ejhg.2015.207
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) using cell-free DNA for aneuploidy is a highly accurate screening test; however, concerns exist around the potential for routinisation of testing. The multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC) is a quantitative instrument developed to assess informed choice for Down syndrome screening (DSS). We have validated a modified MMIC for NIPT and measured informed choice among women offered NIPT in a public health service. The measure was distributed to women recruited across eight maternity units in the United Kingdom who had accepted DSS. Construct validity was assessed by simultaneously conducting qualitative interviews. Five hundred and eighty-five questionnaires were completed and 45 interviews conducted after blood-draw (or equivalent for those that declined NIPT). The measure demonstrated good internal consistency and internal validity. Results indicate the vast majority of women (89%) made an informed choice; 95% were judged to have good knowledge, 88% had a positive attitude and 92% had deliberated. Of the 11% judged to have made an uninformed choice, 55% had not deliberated, 41% had insufficient knowledge, and 19% had a negative attitude. Ethnicity (OR=2.78, P=0.003) and accepting NIPT (OR=16.05, P=0.021) were found to be significant predictors of informed choice. The high rate of informed choice is likely to reflect the importance placed on the provision of pre-test counselling in this study. It will be vital to ensure that this is maintained once NIPT is offered in routine clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 816
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins, 2007, Obstet Gynecol, V109, P217
[2]   Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing: UK Genetic Counselors' Experiences and Perspectives [J].
Alexander, Elizabeth ;
Kelly, Susan ;
Kerzin-Storrar, Lauren .
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING, 2015, 24 (02) :300-311
[3]   What hinders minority ethnic access to cancer genetics services and what may help? [J].
Allford, Anna ;
Qureshi, Nadeem ;
Barwell, Julian ;
Lewis, Celine ;
Kai, Joe .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2014, 22 (07) :866-874
[4]  
Ames AG, 2012, HLTH EXPECT, V18, P69
[5]   Measuring informed choice in population-based reproductive genetic screening: a systematic review [J].
Ames, Alice Grace ;
Metcalfe, Sylvia Ann ;
Archibald, Alison Dalton ;
Duncan, Rony Emily ;
Emery, Jon .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2015, 23 (01) :8-21
[6]   Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Fetal Aneuploidy [J].
不详 .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 120 (06) :1532-1534
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Handbook of psychological testing
[8]  
Beauchamp T., 1995, ENCY BIOETHICS, P1238
[9]   Aneuploidy screening: a position statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, January 2011 [J].
Benn, Peter ;
Borrell, Antoni ;
Crossley, Jenny ;
Cuckle, Howard ;
Dugoff, Lorraine ;
Gross, Susan ;
Johnson, Jo-ann ;
Maymon, Ron ;
Odibo, Anthony ;
Schielen, Peter ;
Spencer, Kevin ;
Wright, Dave ;
Yaron, Yuval .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2011, 31 (06) :519-522
[10]   Impact on informed choice of offering antenatal sickle cell and thalassaemia screening in primary care: a randomized trial [J].
Brown, Katrina ;
Dormandy, Elizabeth ;
Reid, Erin ;
Gulliford, Martin ;
Marteau, Theresa .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (02) :65-75