The Needham Puzzle Reconsidered: Organizations, Organizing, and Innovation in China

被引:13
作者
Augier, Mie [1 ]
Guo, Jerry [2 ]
Rowen, Harry [3 ]
机构
[1] Naval Postgraduate Sch, Monterey, CA USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Tepper Sch Business, Org Behav & theory, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
China; competition; innovation; R & D; ECONOMIC-DEVELOPMENT; EUROPE; PERFORMANCE; BUSINESS; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1017/mor.2016.5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper discusses some aspects of innovation in China. As China seeks to transition to a knowledge-based economy, it may become more important for China to develop innovative technologies to sustain economic growth. How do China's history, culture, institutions, and organizations aid or hinder innovation? How does China's national innovation system compare to the innovation culture in the US, as well as other developed and emerging economies? What are the prospects for the future of the Chinese national innovation system? Our starting point is the Needham Puzzle - the paradox that while China was once a world leader in technological development, it fell behind; the Industrial Revolution happened in Europe rather than in China. Potential explanations for the Needham Puzzle may shed light on the challenges facing innovation in modern China. We identify three factors that might help explain the Needham Puzzle; assess how the Needham Puzzle and Chinese culture and history have affected the modern innovation system; discuss comparative aspects of innovation ecosystems in the United States and elsewhere; and suggest that Chinese innovation emphasizes exploitation and refinement of existing knowledge to the exploration and development of new knowledge. We also discuss implications for the future of innovation in China.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 24
页数:20
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   Growing where you are planted: Exogenous firms and the seeding of Silicon Valley [J].
Adams, Stephen B. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2011, 40 (03) :368-379
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, International Journal of the Economics of Business, DOI [DOI 10.1080/13571510110079612, 10.1080/13571510110079612]
[3]  
[Anonymous], J KNOWLEDGE BASED IN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1967, BUREAUCRATIC PHENOME
[5]  
Augier M., 2011, ROOTS RITUALS RHETOR
[6]   The Flaring of Intellectual Outliers: An Organizational Interpretation of the Generation of Novelty in the RAND Corporation [J].
Augier, Mie ;
March, James G. ;
Marshall, Andrew W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (04) :1140-1161
[7]  
Baark E., 2007, ASIA PAC BUS REV, V13, P337, DOI DOI 10.1080/13602380701291917
[8]   Organizational routines: a review of the literature [J].
Becker, MC .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2004, 13 (04) :643-677
[9]   The early modern great divergence: wages, prices and economic development in Europe and Asia, 1500-1800 [J].
Broadberry, S ;
Gupta, B .
ECONOMIC HISTORY REVIEW, 2006, 59 (01) :2-31
[10]   ORDER AND CONTROL - SCIENTIFIC METHOD IN CHINA AND UNITED-STATES [J].
BUCK, P .
SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE, 1975, 5 (03) :237-267