Comparative efficacy of inhaled medications (ICS/LABA, LAMA, LAMA/LABA and SAMA) for COPD: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:41
作者
Aziz, Mohamed Ismail Abdul [1 ]
Tan, Ling Eng [1 ]
Wu, David Bin-Chia [1 ]
Pearce, Fiona [1 ]
Chua, Gerald Seng Wee [2 ]
Lin, Liang [1 ]
Tan, Ping-Tee [1 ]
Ng, Kwong [1 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Agcy Care Effectiveness, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Ng Teng Fong Gen Hosp, Div Med, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
anticholinergics; muscarinic antagonists; frequentist meta-analysis; mixed treatment comparison; indirect treatment comparison; chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE; DAILY FLUTICASONE FUROATE/VILANTEROL; DAILY ACLIDINIUM BROMIDE; FIXED-DOSE COMBINATIONS; UMECLIDINIUM/VILANTEROL; 62.5/25; MCG; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; TWICE-DAILY SALMETEROL; ONCE-DAILY TIOTROPIUM; MU-G; LUNG-FUNCTION;
D O I
10.2147/COPD.S173472
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To assess the comparative efficacy of short-acting muscarinic antagonists (SAMAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), LAMA in combination with long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs; LAMA/LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with LABA (ICS/LABAs) for the maintenance treatment of COPD. Materials and methods: We systematically reviewed 74 randomized controlled trials (74,832 participants) published up to 15 November 2017, which compared any of the interventions (SAMA [ipratropium], LAMA [aclidinium, glycopyrronium, tiotropium, umeclidinium], LAMA/LABA [aclidinium/formoterol, indacaterol/glycopyrronium, tiotropium/olodaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol] and ICS/LABA [fluticasone/vilanterol, budesonide/formoterol, salmeterol/fluticasone]) with each other or with placebo. A random-effects network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was conducted to examine the change from baseline in trough FEV1, transition dyspnea index, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire and frequency of adverse events at weeks 12 and 24. Results: Inconsistency models were not statistically significant for all outcomes. LAMAs, LAMA/LABAs and ICS/LABAs led to a significantly greater improvement in trough FEV1 compared with placebo and SAMA monotherapy at weeks 12 and 24. All LAMA/LABAs, except aclidinium/formoterol, were statistically significantly better than LAMA monotherapy and ICS/LABAs in improving trough FEV1. Among the LAMAs, umeclidinium showed statistically significant improvement in trough FEV1 at week 12 compared to tiotropium and glycopyrronium, but the results were not clinically significant. LAMA/LABAs had the highest probabilities of being ranked the best agents in FEV1 improvement. Similar trends were observed for the transition dyspnea index and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire outcomes. There were no significant differences in the incidences of adverse events among all treatment options. Conclusion: LAMA/LABA showed the greatest improvement in trough FEV1 at weeks 12 and 24 compared with the other inhaled drug classes, while SAMA showed the least improvement. There were no significant differences among the LAMAs and LAMA/LABAs within their respective classes.
引用
收藏
页码:3203 / 3231
页数:29
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   A comparison of the efficacy and safety of once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol with twice-daily fluticasone propionate/salmeterol in moderate to very severe COPD [J].
Agusti, Alvar ;
de Teresa, Luis ;
De Backer, Wilfried ;
Zvarich, Michael T. ;
Locantore, Nicholas ;
Barnes, Neil ;
Bourbeau, Jean ;
Crim, Courtney .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 43 (03) :763-772
[2]   Health status instruments for patients with COPD in pulmonary rehabilitation: defining a minimal clinically important difference [J].
Alma, Harma ;
de Jong, Corina ;
Jelusic, Danijel ;
Wittmann, Michael ;
Schuler, Michael ;
Flokstra-de Blok, Bertine ;
Kocks, Janwillem ;
Schultz, Konrad ;
van der Molen, Thys .
NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 26
[3]  
Ambrosino Nicolino, 2008, Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, V3, P771
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ERJ OPEN RES
[6]   The Tiotropium Safety and Performance in Respimat® (TIOSPIR®) Trial: Spirometry Outcomes [J].
Anzueto, Antonio ;
Wise, Robert ;
Calverley, Peter ;
Dusser, Daniel ;
Tang, Wenbo ;
Metzdorf, Norbert ;
Dahl, Ronald .
RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2015, 16
[7]   Anti-inflammatory effects of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 mcg combination therapy in Japanese patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Asai, Kazuhisa ;
Kobayashi, Akihiro ;
Makihara, Yukio ;
Johnson, Malcolm .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2015, 10 :803-811
[8]   A one-year trial of tiotropium Respimat® plus usual therapy in COPD patients [J].
Bateman, E. D. ;
Tashkin, D. ;
Siafakas, N. ;
Dahl, R. ;
Towse, L. ;
Massey, D. ;
Pavia, D. ;
Zhong, N. S. .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2010, 104 (10) :1460-1472
[9]  
Bateman Eric, 2010, Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, V5, P197
[10]   Dual bronchodilation with QVA149 versus single bronchoditator therapy: the SHINE study [J].
Bateman, Eric D. ;
Ferguson, Gary T. ;
Barnes, Neil ;
Gallagher, Nicola ;
Green, Yulia ;
Henley, Michelle ;
Banerji, Donald .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42 (06) :1484-1494