Do innovation in environmental-related technologies cyclically and asymmetrically affect environmental sustainability in BRICS nations?

被引:96
作者
Ahmad, Manzoor [1 ]
Zheng, Jianghuai [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Dept Ind Econ, Sch Econ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
关键词
Innovation in environmental-related technologies; Business cycles; CO2; emissions; Export tax; BRICS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; CARBON EMISSIONS; FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; SOUTH-AFRICA; UNIT ROOTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101746
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
This study contributes to the current research by identifying the cyclical and asymmetrical impact of innovation in environmental-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS economies, as well as control variables such as fossil fuels, export taxes, household consumption expenditures, and exports, for the period 1990 (Q1)-2016 (Q4). Following are some of the key findings. First, the data analysis indicated a significant long-term positive link between negative shocks to innovation in environmental-related technologies and carbon dioxide emissions during the economic downturn. Second, positive shocks to innovation in environmental-related technologies minimize carbon dioxide emissions during the economic upturn. Third, the relationship between innovation shocks in environmental-related technologies and carbon dioxide emissions was counter-cyclical during business cycles. Fourth, impact of positive shocks to innovation in environmental-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions was more than the impact of negative shocks to innovation in environmental-related technologies on carbon dioxide emissions. Fifth, increasing the export tax serve as an effective measure to mitigate carbon dioxide emissions. Sixth, an increase in exports, use of fossil fuels, and household consumption expenditures contributed to the carbon dioxide emissions. Based on estimated results, the paper suggests policy implications for policymakers to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Agung I.G.N., 2011, Time series data analysis using EViews
[2]   Is Aggregate Domestic Consumption Spending (ADCS) Per Capita Determining CO2 Emissions in South Africa? A New Perspective [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2020, 75 (03) :529-552
[3]   Non-linear dynamics of innovation activities over the business cycles: Empirical evidence from OECD economies [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2021, 67
[4]   Innovation, foreign direct investment (FDI), and the energy-pollution-growth nexus in OECD region: a simultaneous equation modeling approach [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal ;
Khan, Anwar ;
Rahman, Zia Ur .
ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECOLOGICAL STATISTICS, 2020, 27 (02) :203-232
[5]   Do aggregate domestic consumption spending & technological innovation affect industrialization in South Africa? An application of linear & non-linear ARDL models [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal ;
Khan, Shehzad ;
Rahman, Zia Ur .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (01) :43-64
[6]   Can innovation shocks determine CO2 emissions (CO2e) in the OECD economies? A new perspective [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Rahman, Zia Ur ;
Khattak, Shoukat Iqbal ;
Khan, Zia Ullah .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 30 (01) :89-109
[7]   Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO2 emissions in China? An application of the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Rahman, Zia Ur ;
Khan, Shehzad .
CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (06) :631-644
[8]  
Ali W., 2016, INT J ENERGY EC POLI, V6, P389
[9]   Energy Innovations-GHG Emissions Nexus: Fresh Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries [J].
Alvarez-Herranz, Agustin ;
Balsalobre, Daniel ;
Maria Cantos, Jose ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 101 :90-100
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Environmental Policy, Technological Innovation and Patents, OECD Studies on Environmental Innovation, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264046825-EN