Infrastructure decision-making: Opening up governance futures within techno-economic modelling

被引:3
作者
Lovell, Katherine [1 ]
Watson, Jim [2 ]
Hiteva, Ralitsa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sci Policy Res Unit, Business Sch, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
[2] UCL, Bartlett UCL Fac Built Environm, Inst Sustainable Resources, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Infrastructure; Governance; Policy decisions; Techno-economic modelling; Socio-technical systems; TRANSITION PATHWAYS; SYSTEM; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121208
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Techno-economic modelling is an important tool in evidence-building, futures assessment and decision-making in policy for socio-technical systems. However, critical assessment of the fit of sophisticated models into a decision-making context is often hidden or overlooked. Using the case of a national infrastructure systems model, this paper connects conceptions of infrastructure governance to techno-economic modelling assessing future infrastructure performance. Analysis of modelling input to a UK national level infrastructure policy process demonstrates the importance of governance understanding within infrastructure modelling for policy and it highlights the risks of not explicitly considering governance assumptions. Going on to pursue a more integrated approach to infrastructure modelling and governance, socio-technical researchers embedded within a model development research project are able to observe model development, analyse an early policy application, and facilitate discussions and co-development work with modellers. A methodological framework, building on recent transitions research 'bridging' socio-technical and techno-economic approaches, for connecting infrastructure governance understanding into techno-economic modelling analyses is presented and its use within this UK infrastructure modelling project is discussed. The integrated approach taken and the methodological framework developed are potential tools for researchers working with techno-economic models to support policy decisions; they show potential for further research on infrastructure futures.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IND STRAT BUILD BRIT
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, RES AH LONGT VIS OUR
[3]  
BEIS (Department of Business Energy and Industrial Strategy), 2019, CARB CAPT US STOR CC
[4]   Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure [J].
Broto, Vanesa Castan ;
Bulkeley, Harriet .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 37 (06) :1934-1948
[5]   Governance mechanisms in domestic and international buyer-supplier relationships: An empirical study [J].
Burkert, Michael ;
Ivens, Bjoern Sven ;
Shan, Jialu .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 41 (03) :544-556
[6]  
Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy, 2019, NEWS STOR UK BEC 1 M
[7]   AGENCY THEORY - AN ASSESSMENT AND REVIEW [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) :57-74
[8]   Transition pathways for a UK low carbon electricity future [J].
Foxon, Timothy J. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 :10-24
[9]   Branching points for transition pathways: assessing responses of actors to challenges on pathways to a low carbon future [J].
Foxon, Timothy J. ;
Pearson, Peter J. G. ;
Arapostathis, Stathis ;
Carlsson-Hyslop, Anna ;
Thornton, Judith .
ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 :146-158
[10]   Developing transition pathways for a low carbon electricity system in the UK [J].
Foxon, Timothy J. ;
Hammond, Geoffrey P. ;
Pearson, Peter J. G. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2010, 77 (08) :1203-1213