Does adding a psychosocial cessation intervention to an existing life skills and tobacco prevention program influence the use of tobacco and supari among secondary school students?: Findings from a quasi experimental trial in Mumbai, India

被引:7
|
作者
Chatterjee, Nilesh [1 ]
Gupte, Himanshu [2 ]
Mandal, Gauri [1 ]
Bhutia, Tshering [1 ]
机构
[1] Salaam Bombay Fdn, Mumbai 400021, Maharashtra, India
[2] Narotam Sekhsaria Fdn, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
来源
TOBACCO PREVENTION & CESSATION | 2019年 / 5卷
关键词
tobacco; adolescents; supari (betel nut); psychosocial cessation intervention; school-based; CONTROL POLICIES; CHILDREN; SMOKING;
D O I
10.18332/tpc/113355
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to test whether school-going adolescents who self-report tobacco and/or supari use are more likely to quit if a school-based psychosocial cessation intervention is added to an existing life-skills and tobacco-prevention program. METHODS A quasi-experimental trial with pre-test and post-test 20 weeks after the intervention was conducted with students from low-income families in 12 schools in Mumbai; six schools were randomly assigned to the intervention and the remaining to the comparison condition. Participants were students from grades 7, 8 and 9 who self-reported tobacco and/or supari use. Intervention schools received six sessions of Life-First, a psychosocial group-based tobacco cessation intervention program, in addition to SuperArmy, a school-wide life-skills and tobacco-prevention program. Trained counselors facilitated the cessation intervention, which spanned five months. All students in comparison schools received only SuperArmy. The outcome measures were self-reported use of tobacco-only, supari-only, and tobacco plus supari in the past 30 days. RESULTS The number of all users decreased by 19.1% in the intervention and 18.7% in the comparison schools at post-test. Although this reduction was significant (p<0.001) within each group, the difference between intervention and comparison schools was not significant. Further segregation by type of product used showed that for tobacco-only users there was a non-significant increase of 1.7% in intervention schools, and a significant 26.2% increase (p<0.001) in the comparison group. Tobacco plus supari use declined in both groups; however, supari-only use fell by 14.8% in the intervention and 32.7% in the comparison schools (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The combination of a cessation intervention along with the life-skills and tobacco-prevention program appear to have halted tobacco-only use in the intervention group. Future research needs to determine whether students are substituting supari for tobacco and to understand the psychological mechanisms underlying the cessation intervention and the interaction between cessation and prevention-only interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据