Firm routines, customer switching and market selection under duopoly

被引:4
作者
Currie, M [1 ]
Metcalfe, S
机构
[1] Victoria Univ Manchester, Sch Econ Studies, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Victoria Univ Manchester, ESRC Ctr Res Innovat & Competit, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
non-linear dynamics; firm adjustment routines; market selection;
D O I
10.1007/PL00003866
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper explores the dynamics of market selection for an industry in which firms employ relatively simple pricing, production and investment routines and in which consumers switch between rival firms in response to price differentials but do not all do so instantaneously. The key issue is whether market processes result in the elimination of less efficient firms by their more efficient rivals. That is to say, do such processes unfailingly increase the efficiency with which available economic resources are used? In the context of duopoly, we show that the survival of the more efficient firm is not guaranteed and that, more generally, the outcome depends upon the speeds with which firms adjust prices and capacities and with which customers switch between rival firms.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 456
页数:24
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Dynamic duopoly with slowly changing customer loyalties [J].
Chen, YM ;
Rosenthal, RW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1996, 14 (03) :269-296
[2]  
Cyert M., 1963, BEHAV THEORY FIRM
[3]  
Metcalfe J.S., 1998, EVOLUTIONARY EC CREA
[4]  
Phelps E.S., 1970, MICROECONOMIC FDN EM
[5]   The chaotic duopolists revisited [J].
Puu, T .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1998, 33 (3-4) :385-394
[6]   A DYNAMIC-MODEL OF DUOPOLY WITH CUSTOMER LOYALTIES [J].
ROSENTHAL, RW .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1982, 27 (01) :69-76
[7]   MODELS OF MARKET ORGANIZATION WITH IMPERFECT INFORMATION - SURVEY [J].
ROTHSCHILD, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (06) :1283-1308
[8]  
Winston G., 1982, TIMING EC ACTIVITIES
[9]  
Winter S.G., 1971, Q J ECON, V85, P237
[10]  
WINTER SG, 1964, YALE ECON ESSAYS, V4, P225