Paxos-based Weighted Argumentation Framework Approach to Distributed Consensus

被引:0
作者
Mocanu, Andrei [1 ]
Badica, Costin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Craiova, Comp & Informat Technol Dept, Bvd Decebal 107, Craiova 200440, Romania
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INNOVATIONS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND APPLICATIONS (INISTA) | 2016年
关键词
Distributed Consensus; Paxos; Argumentation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Paxos is regarded as one of the most important protocols for distributed consensus in the presence of failures. It uses a number of 2f+1 processes to tolerate the benign failure of f processes, by splitting them into different roles with tailored tasks. The protocol presents multiple engineering challenges, two of which are pinpointing the cause for stalling and identifying the faulty processes. In this paper, we propose an alternative solution based on weighted argumentation frameworks by introducing Distributed Dispute Trees and a new role (the Skeptic) which ensures safety by attacking each condition that is not met in the Paxos protocol. The other processes must collaborate to defeat the Skeptic and achieve consensus.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] A Common Computational Framework for Semiring-based Argumentation Systems
    Bistarelli, Stefano
    Santini, Francesco
    [J]. ECAI 2010 - 19TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 215 : 131 - 136
  • [2] An artificial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation applied to food quality in a public health policy
    Bourguet, Jean-Remi
    Thomopoulos, Rallou
    Mugnier, Marie-Laure
    Abecassis, Joel
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (11) : 4539 - 4546
  • [3] Burrows M, 2006, USENIX ASSOCIATION 7TH USENIX SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATING SYSTEMS DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION, P335
  • [4] Chandra T, 2007, PODC'07: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON PRINCIPLES OF DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING, P398
  • [5] Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation - A survey
    Charwat, Guenther
    Dvorak, Wolfgang
    Gaggl, Sarah A.
    Wallner, Johannes P.
    Woltran, Stefan
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2015, 220 : 28 - 63
  • [6] Dung PM, 2009, ARGUMENTATION IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, P199, DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_10
  • [7] ON THE ACCEPTABILITY OF ARGUMENTS AND ITS FUNDAMENTAL ROLE IN NONMONOTONIC REASONING, LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND N-PERSON GAMES
    DUNG, PM
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 77 (02) : 321 - 357
  • [8] Dunne P. E., 2009, AAMAS 09, P851
  • [9] Evripidou V., 2014, J DECISION SYSTEMS
  • [10] FISCHER MJ, 1983, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V158, P127