Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society

被引：0
作者：
Goldstone, Alan [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
来源：
POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW | 2008年 / 6卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号：
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：83 / 84
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Without good reason, the rationality debate in philosophy cognitive science [J].
Engel, P .
SYNTHESE, 1998, 115 (03) :375-393
[42]   Science in society - Cloning plan spawns ethics debate [J].
Kestenbaum, D .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5349) :315-315
[43]   The Extended (Evolutionary) Synthesis Debate: Where Science Meets Philosophy [J].
Pigliucci, Massimo ;
Finkelman, Leonard .
BIOSCIENCE, 2014, 64 (06) :511-516
[44]   The Debate on Immortality: Posthumanist Science vs. Critical Philosophy [J].
Noonan, Jeff .
EUROPEAN LEGACY-TOWARD NEW PARADIGMS, 2016, 21 (01) :38-51
[45]   Without good reason: The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science [J].
Kornblith, H .
PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 10 (04) :555-557
[46]   What Was the Syntax-Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About? [J].
Lutz, Sebastian .
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 95 (02) :319-352
[47]   Without good reason: The rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science [J].
Carruthers, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1998, 49 (01) :189-193
[48]   Without good reason: the rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science [J].
Gert, J .
PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 1999, 49 (195) :275-277
[49]   POPULAR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY - PHRENOLOGY MOVEMENT IN EARLY VICTORIAN BRITAIN [J].
PARSSINEN, TM .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HISTORY, 1974, (FAL) :1-20
[50]   A Tricky Trait: Applying the Fruits of the "Function Debate" in the Philosophy of Biology to the "Venom Debate" in the Science of Toxinology [J].
Jackson, Timothy N. W. ;
Fry, Bryan G. .
TOXINS, 2016, 8 (09)
12345