Effect of fermentation type regulation using alkaline addition on two-phase anaerobic digestion of food waste at different organic load rates

被引:49
作者
Feng, Kai [1 ]
Wang, Qiao [1 ]
Li, Huan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Yangyang [2 ]
Deng, Zhou [3 ]
Liu, Jianguo [1 ,4 ]
Du, Xinrui [5 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Grad Sch Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Guangdong Engn Res Ctr Urban Water Cycle & Enviro, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Lisai Environm Technol Co Ltd, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[5] Shenzhen Zhonghuanbohong Environm Technol Co Ltd, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
关键词
Anaerobic digestion; Fermentation; Food waste; Methane; Sodium hydroxyl; FATTY-ACID PRODUCTION; CO-DIGESTION; SINGLE-STAGE; ACIDOGENIC FERMENTATION; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; METHANE PRODUCTION; ENERGY RECOVERY; VEGETABLE WASTE; 2-STAGE; PH;
D O I
10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.051
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In two-phase anaerobic digestion (TPAD) of food waste, alkaline addition is commonly used to alter fermentation types aiming to improve the subsequent methanogenesis. However, alkaline usage could also cause the accumulation of salt and inhibit methanogens. To discover the opposite effect, a series of continuous TPAD experiments with automatic pH control were conducted at different organic load rates (OLRs). The results indicated that pH regulation was not always effective for TPAD. At the OLR of 1.9 g/(L.d), mixed acid fermentation at pH 6.0 and lactic acid fermentation at pH 4.5 were achieved with the average NaOH dose of 1.69 and 2.45 g/(L.d), respectively, and the subsequent methane production increased to 460 and 482 ml/g in comparison to 380 ml/g in single-phase anaerobic digestion (SPAD). At the OLR of 2.4 g/(L.d), the Na+ concentration in methanogenic phase increased more than 3.5 g/L, resulting in the deterioration of methane production. At the OLRs higher than 3.2 g/(L.d), pH control cannot be applied to TPAD, and SPAD suffered from excessive acidification. Thus, TPAD without pH control became the only choice, but its methane yield was only 397 ml/g, implying new methods should be considered to improve TPAD. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 393
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2017, STANDARD METHODS EXA
  • [2] Effect of sodium salt on anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste
    Anwar, Naveed
    Wang, Wen
    Zhang, Jie
    Li, Yeqing
    Chen, Chang
    Liu, Guangqing
    Zhang, Ruihong
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 73 (08) : 1865 - 1871
  • [3] Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge
    Appels, Lise
    Baeyens, Jan
    Degreve, Jan
    Dewil, Raf
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2008, 34 (06) : 755 - 781
  • [4] Continuous co-digestion of cattle slurry with fruit and vegetable wastes and chicken manure
    Callaghan, FJ
    Wase, DAJ
    Thayanithy, K
    Forster, CF
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2002, 22 (01) : 71 - 77
  • [5] Lactic acid properties, applications and production: A review
    Castillo Martinez, Fabio Andres
    Balciunas, Eduardo Marcos
    Manuel Salgado, Jose
    Dominguez Gonzalez, Jose Manuel
    Converti, Attilio
    de Souza Oliveira, Ricardo Pinheiro
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 30 (01) : 70 - 83
  • [6] Influence of temperature and hydraulic retention on the production of volatile fatty acids during anaerobic fermentation of cow manure and maize silage
    Cavinato, Cristina
    Da Ros, Cinzia
    Pavan, Paolo
    Bolzonella, David
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 223 : 59 - 64
  • [7] Polyhydroxyalkanoate production from fermented volatile fatty acids: Effect of pH and feeding regimes
    Chen, Hong
    Meng, Huijuan
    Nie, Zuchao
    Zhang, Mingmei
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 128 : 533 - 538
  • [8] Improving biomethane yield by controlling fermentation type of acidogenic phase in two-phase anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rice straw
    Chen, Xue
    Yuan, Hairong
    Zou, Dexun
    Liu, Yanping
    Zhu, Baoning
    Chufo, Akiber
    Jaffar, Muhammad
    Li, Xiujin
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2015, 273 : 254 - 260
  • [9] Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review
    Chen, Ye
    Cheng, Jay J.
    Creamer, Kurt S.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 99 (10) : 4044 - 4064
  • [10] Energy recovery from one- and two-stage anaerobic digestion of food waste
    De Gioannis, Giorgia
    Muntoni, Aldo
    Polettini, Alessandra
    Pomi, Raffaella
    Spiga, Daniela
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 68 : 595 - 602