Electroretinographic Assessments of Macular Function after Brilliant Blue G Staining for Inner Limiting Membrane Peeling

被引:0
作者
Terauchi, Gaku [1 ]
Shinoda, Kei [1 ,2 ]
Yagura, Kazuma [1 ]
Kawashima, Makoto [1 ]
Matsumoto, Soiti Celso [1 ,3 ]
Mizota, Atsushi [1 ]
Miyake, Yozo [4 ]
机构
[1] Teikyo Univ, Sch Med, Tokyo 1738606, Japan
[2] Saitama Med Univ, Fac Med, Saitama 3500495, Japan
[3] Matsumoto Eye Clin, Tokushima 7711705, Japan
[4] Kobe Eye Ctr Next Vis, Kobe 6500047, Japan
关键词
brilliant blue G; electroretinogram; epiretinal membrane; inner limiting membrane; macular hole; vitrectomy; INDOCYANINE GREEN; TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE; INTRAVITREAL TRIAMCINOLONE; HOLE; TEMPERATURE; TOXICITY; SURGERY; EYES; VISUALIZATION; VITRECTOMY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm11216404
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of brilliant blue G (BBG) staining of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) on macular function. Method: Fourteen eyes of 14 patients consisting of 9 men and 5 women who underwent vitreous surgery with ILM peeling were studied. The mean age of the patients was 68.8 +/- 9.14 years. Three eyes had a macular hole and eleven eyes had an epiretinal membrane. The ILM was made more visible by spraying 0.25% BBG into the vitreous cavity. The macular function was assessed by recording intraoperative focal macular electroretinograms (iFMERGs) before and after the intravitreal spraying of the BBG dye. The iFMERGs were recorded three times after core vitrectomy. The first recording was performed before the BBG injection (Phase 1, baseline), the second recording was performed after the spraying of the BBG and washing out the excess BBG (Phase 2), and the third recording was performed after the ILM peeling (Phase 3). All recordings were performed after 5 min of light-adaptation and stabilization of the intraocular conditions. The iFMERGs were recorded twice at each phase. The implicit times and amplitudes of the a- and b-wave, the PhNR, and the d-wave were measured. Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to determine the significance of differences of the findings at Phase 2 vs. Phase 1 and Phase 3 vs. Phase 1. A p value < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Results: The average implicit times of the a-wave, b-wave, PhNR, and d-wave were not significantly different in Phase 1, 2, and 3. The average a-wave, b-wave, PhNR, and d-wave amplitudes at Phase 1 did not differ significantly from that at Phase 2 and at Phase 3. Conclusions: The results indicated that the intravitreal injection of BBG does not alter the physiology of the macula, and we conclude that BBG is safe. We also conclude that iFMERGs can be used to monitor the macular function safely during intraocular surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Epiretinal membrane negative staining and double peeling in a single block with Brilliant Blue G
    Martins, David
    Neves, Pedro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 112 - 116
  • [32] Macular Slippage After Macular Hole Surgery with Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling
    Nakagomi, Tomomi
    Goto, Teruhiko
    Tateno, Yasushi
    Oshiro, Tomohiro
    Iijima, Hiroyuki
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2013, 38 (12) : 1255 - 1260
  • [33] Imaging the Area of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling after Macular Hole Surgery
    Clemens, Christoph R.
    Obergassel, Justus
    Heiduschka, Peter
    Eter, Nicole
    Alten, Florian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (13)
  • [34] "Brilliant Blue G" and "Membrane Blue Dual" assisted Vitrectomy for Macular Hole
    Kovacevic, Damir
    Mance, Tea Caljkusic
    Markusic, Vedran
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2011, 35 : 191 - 193
  • [35] 20 g PPV with indocyanine green-assisted ILM peeling versus 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G-assisted ILM peeling for epiretinal membrane
    Manousaridis, Kleanthis
    Peter, Silvia
    Mennel, Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 36 (03) : 407 - 412
  • [36] 20 g PPV with indocyanine green-assisted ILM peeling versus 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G-assisted ILM peeling for epiretinal membrane
    Kleanthis Manousaridis
    Silvia Peter
    Stefan Mennel
    International Ophthalmology, 2016, 36 : 407 - 412
  • [37] Retinal Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness after Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Idiopathic Macular Hole
    Sheng, Yan
    Tong, Jian-Ping
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2014, 39 (05) : 537 - 538
  • [38] Morphological and Functional Outcome after Brilliant Blue G-Assisted Macular Hole Surgery
    Lueke, Julia
    Luedeke, Inger
    Acksteiner, Alina
    Nassar, Khaled
    Hoerauf, Hans
    Grisanti, Salvatore
    Lueke, Matthias
    OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2013, 230 (02) : 81 - 86
  • [39] Accidental Subretinal Brilliant Blue G Migration During Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Surgery
    Almeida, Felipe P. P.
    De Lucca, Ana Claudia
    Scott, Ingrid Ursula
    Jorge, Rodrigo
    Messias, Andre
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 133 (01) : 85 - 88
  • [40] THE EFFECT OF INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING ON THE INNER RETINAL LAYERS IN PATIENTS WITHOUT MACULAR PATHOLOGIC CONDITION
    Belkin, Avner
    Harel, Gal
    Shtayer, Chen
    Bercovich, Or
    Rubowitz, Alexander
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2024, 44 (05): : 831 - 836