Gentamicin Improves the Activities of Daptomycin and Vancomycin against Enterococcus faecalis In Vitro and in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model

被引:38
|
作者
Tafin, Ulrika Furustrand [1 ,2 ]
Majic, Ivana [3 ]
Zalila, Cyrine Belkhodja [1 ,2 ]
Betrisey, Bertrand [1 ,2 ]
Corvec, Stephane [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Zimmerli, Werner [5 ]
Trampuz, Andrej [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lausanne Hosp, Dept Med, Infect Dis Serv, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Lausanne, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Basel Hosp, Infect Dis Res Lab, Dept Biomed, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[4] CHU Nantes, Inst Biol, Hop Nantes, Serv Bacteriol Hygiene, F-44035 Nantes 01, France
[5] Univ Med Clin, Liestal, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; EFFICACY; PHARMACOKINETICS; MICROCALORIMETRY; RESISTANCE; PATHOGENESIS; COMBINATION; STRAINS; COLI;
D O I
10.1128/AAC.00141-11
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
For enterococcal implant-associated infections, the optimal treatment regimen has not been defined. We investigated the activity of daptomycin, vancomycin, and gentamicin (and their combinations) against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro and in a foreign-body infection model. Antimicrobial activity was investigated by time-kill and growth-related heat production studies (microcalorimetry) as well as with a guinea pig model using subcutaneously implanted cages. Infection was established by percutaneous injection of E. faecalis in the cage. Antibiotic treatment for 4 days was started 3 h after infection. Cages were removed 5 days after end of treatment to determine the cure rate. The MIC, the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) in the logarithmic phase, and the MBC in the stationary phase were 1.25, 5, and >20 mu g/ml for daptomycin, 1, >64, and >64 mu g/ml for vancomycin, and 16, 32, and 4 mu g/ml for gentamicin, respectively. In vitro, gentamicin at subinhibitory concentrations improved the activity against E. faecalis when combined with daptomycin or vancomycin in the logarithmic and stationary phases. In the animal model, daptomycin cured 25%, vancomycin 17%, and gentamicin 50% of infected cages. In combination with gentamicin, the cure rate for daptomycin increased to 55% and that of vancomycin increased to 33%. In conclusion, daptomycin was more active than vancomycin against adherent E. faecalis, and its activity was further improved by the addition of gentamicin. Despite a short duration of infection (3 h), the cure rates did not exceed 55%, highlighting the difficulty of eradicating E. faecalis from implants already in the early stage of implant-associated infection.
引用
收藏
页码:4821 / 4827
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Activities of Fosfomycin and Rifampin on Planktonic and Adherent Enterococcus faecalis Strains in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model
    Oliva, Alessandra
    Tafin, Ulrika Furustrand
    Maiolo, Elena Maryka
    Jeddari, Safaa
    Betrisey, Bertrand
    Trampuz, Andrej
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 58 (03) : 1284 - 1293
  • [2] High Activity of Fosfomycin and Rifampin against MethicillinResistant Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm In Vitro and in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model
    Mihailescu, Raluca
    Tafin, Ulrika Furustrand
    Corvec, Stephane
    Oliva, Alessandra
    Betrisey, Bertrand
    Borens, Oliver
    Trampuz, Andrej
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2014, 58 (05) : 2547 - 2553
  • [3] Role of Rifampin against Propionibacterium acnes Biofilm In Vitro and in an Experimental Foreign-Body Infection Model
    Tafin, Ulrika Furustrand
    Corvec, Stephane
    Betrisey, Bertrand
    Zimmerli, Werner
    Trampuz, Andrej
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (04) : 1885 - 1891
  • [4] Pharmacodynamics of Daptomycin against Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis in the Murine Thigh Infection Model
    Kidd, James M.
    Abdelraouf, Kamilia
    Asempa, Tomefa E.
    Humphries, Romney M.
    Nicolau, David P.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2018, 62 (10)
  • [5] β-Lactams Enhance Daptomycin Activity against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium in In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Models
    Smith, Jordan R.
    Barber, Katie E.
    Raut, Animesh
    Rybak, Michael J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2015, 59 (05) : 2842 - 2848
  • [6] Activities of Fosfomycin, Tigecycline, Colistin, and Gentamicin against Extended-Spectrum-β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli in a Foreign-Body Infection Model
    Corvec, Stephane
    Tafin, Ulrika Furustrand
    Betrisey, Bertrand
    Borens, Olivier
    Trampuz, Andrej
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2013, 57 (03) : 1421 - 1427
  • [7] Is Penicillin Plus Gentamicin Synergistic Against Sessile Group B Streptococcal Isolates? An in Vivo Study With an Experimental Model of Foreign-Body Infection
    Ruppen, Corinne
    Mercier, Thomas
    Grandgirard, Denis
    Leib, Stephen L.
    El Haj, Cristina
    Murillo, Oscar
    Decosterd, Laurent
    Sendi, Parham
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [8] In vivo synergism of ampicillin, gentamicin, ceftaroline and ceftriaxone against Enterococcus faecalis assessed in the Galleria mellonella infection model
    Thieme, Lara
    Hartung, Anita
    Makarewicz, Oliwia
    Pletz, Mathias W.
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2020, 75 (08) : 2173 - 2181
  • [9] Efficacy of Daptomycin versus Vancomycin in an Experimental Model of Foreign-Body and Systemic Infection Caused by Biofilm Producers and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis
    Dominguez-Herrera, J.
    Docobo-Perez, F.
    Lopez-Rojas, R.
    Pichardo, C.
    Ruiz-Valderas, R.
    Lepe, J. A.
    Pachon, J.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2012, 56 (02) : 613 - 617
  • [10] Daptomycin combinations as alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection caused by meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus
    El Haj, Cristina
    Murillo, Oscar
    Ribera, Alba
    Vivas, Mireia
    Garcia-Somoza, Dolors
    Tubau, Fe
    Cabellos, Carmen
    Cabo, Javier
    Ariza, Javier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2015, 46 (02) : 189 - 195