Social dimension and complexity differentially influence brain responses during feedback processing

被引:22
作者
Pfabigan, Daniela M. [1 ,2 ]
Gittenberger, Marianne [1 ]
Lamm, Claus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Social Cognit & Affect Neurosci Unit, Dept Basic Psychol Res & Res Methods, Fac Psychol, Vienna, Austria
[2] Peking Univ, Culture & Social Cognit Neurosci Lab, Sch Psychol & Cognit Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Performance monitoring; social stimuli; stimulus saliency; FRN; P300; TIME-ESTIMATION TASK; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; REWARD PREDICTION; COGNITIVE CONTROL; NEGATIVITY; EXPECTANCY; SIGNALS; EMOTION; ERRORS;
D O I
10.1080/17470919.2017.1395765
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Recent research emphasizes the importance of social factors during performance monitoring. Thus, the current study investigated the impact of social stimuli -such as communicative gestures- on feedback processing. Moreover, it addressed a shortcoming of previous studies, which failed to consider stimulus complexity as potential confounding factor. Twenty-four volunteers performed a time estimation task while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Either social complex, social non-complex, non-social complex, or non-social non-complex stimuli were used to provide performance feedback. No effects of social dimension or complexity were found for task performance. In contrast, Feedback-Related Negativity (FRN) and P300 amplitudes were sensitive to both factors, with larger FRN and P300 amplitudes after social compared to non-social stimuli, and larger FRN amplitudes after complex positive than non-complex positive stimuli. P2 amplitudes were solely sensitive to feedback valence and social dimension. Subjectively, social complex stimuli were rated as more motivating than non-social complex ones. Independently of each other, social dimension and visual complexity influenced amplitude variation during performance monitoring. Social stimuli seem to be perceived as more salient, which is corroborated by P2, FRN and P300 results, as well as by subjective ratings. This could be explained due to their given relevance during every day social interactions.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 40
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   The Social Brain: Neural Basis of Social Knowledge [J].
Adolphs, Ralph .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 60 :693-716
[2]   Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor [J].
Alexander, William H. ;
Brown, Joshua W. .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 14 (10) :1338-U163
[3]   Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game [J].
Alexopoulos, Johanna ;
Pfabigan, Daniela M. ;
Lamm, Claus ;
Bauer, Herbert ;
Fischmeister, Florian Ph. S. .
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, BODYTALK MEANING HUM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, EMOTIONS REVEALED RE
[6]   AN INFORMATION MAXIMIZATION APPROACH TO BLIND SEPARATION AND BLIND DECONVOLUTION [J].
BELL, AJ ;
SEJNOWSKI, TJ .
NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1995, 7 (06) :1129-1159
[7]   Learning-related changes in reward expectancy are reflected in the feedback-related negativity [J].
Bellebaum, Christian ;
Daum, Irene .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 27 (07) :1823-1835
[8]   Facial expressions, their communicatory functions and neuro-cognitive substrates [J].
Blair, RJR .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 358 (1431) :561-572
[9]   Failing where others have succeeded: Medial Frontal Negativity tracks failure in a social context [J].
Boksem, Maarten A. S. ;
Kostermans, Evelien ;
De Cremer, David .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 (07) :973-979
[10]   IF ATTITUDES AFFECT HOW STIMULI ARE PROCESSED, SHOULD THEY NOT AFFECT THE EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIAL [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
CRITES, SL ;
BERNTSON, GG ;
COLES, MGH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (02) :108-112