Optimising Train Axle Inspection with the Implementation of Human-Robot Collaboration: A Human Factors Perspective

被引:0
作者
Charalambous, George [1 ]
Stout, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] SNC Lavalin Rail & Transit, Human Factors, London, England
来源
2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT RAIL TRANSPORTATION (ICIRT) | 2016年
关键词
train axle inspection; human-robot collaboration; human factors; trust; organisational; SYSTEM; AUTOMATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Train axle inspection tasks rely on human operators working in and around depots and pits, searching for and identifying defects, with the use of non-destructive testing methods. Characteristics of the working environment and equipment design increase the likelihood of human error due to a variety of issues such as poor lighting, restricted access, awkward postures and limitations associated with the design of equipment interfaces. The purpose of this discussion paper is to encourage debate amongst the rail industry by proposing a new concept for carrying out this task, namely human-robot collaboration. Literature review from comparable domains has identified that human-collaborative robotic systems have been proposed and developed to optimise asset health monitoring. This concept could potentially be applied to train axle inspection with profound implications. At the same time, it is acknowledged that integrating humans and robotic systems within the same workspace will be a significant challenge and will require a holistic human factors approach. To this end, the latest empirical research on the key human factors that need to be considered, at an organisational and individual level, for the successful integration of humans and robots in industrial applications is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 258
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [21] La HM, 2014, IEEE INT C INT ROBOT, P1950, DOI 10.1109/IROS.2014.6942821
  • [22] Lee J.H., 2008, The 23rd International Technical Conference on Circuits/Systems, Computers and Communications, P1213
  • [23] Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance
    Lee, JD
    See, KA
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2004, 46 (01) : 50 - 80
  • [24] Factors impacting AMT implementation: an integrative and controlled study
    Lewis, MW
    Boyer, KK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 19 (02) : 111 - 130
  • [25] McDermott CM, 1999, J OPER MANAG, V17, P521, DOI 10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00008-X
  • [26] Bridge inspection robot system with machine vision
    Oh, Je-Keun
    Jang, Giho
    Oh, Semin
    Lee, Jeong Ho
    Yi, Byung-Ju
    Moon, Young Shik
    Lee, Jong Seh
    Choi, Youngjin
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2009, 18 (07) : 929 - 941
  • [27] Humans and Automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
    Parasuraman, R
    Riley, V
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 1997, 39 (02) : 230 - 253
  • [28] Development of an integrated total quality management and performance measurement system for self-assessment: A method
    Pun, KF
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 13 (06): : 759 - 777
  • [29] Monitoring crack changes in concrete structures
    Sohn, HG
    Lim, YM
    Yun, KH
    Kim, GH
    [J]. COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2005, 20 (01) : 52 - 61
  • [30] The development of a mobile manipulator imaging system for bridge crack inspection
    Tung, PC
    Hwang, YR
    Wu, MC
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2002, 11 (06) : 717 - 729