The efficacy and safety of the ganglion impar block in chronic intractable pelvic and/or perineal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Li, Cheng-Bao [1 ]
Fang, Shang-Ping [2 ]
Chen, Yuan-Li [3 ,4 ]
Huang, Ying [3 ,4 ]
Yao, Xue-Ya [1 ]
Ge, Xin-Yu [1 ]
Zhong, Ming [5 ]
Tian, Fu-Bo [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Hebei North Univ, Sch Med, Zhangjiakou, Hebei, Peoples R China
[2] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 419 Fangxie Rd, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
[3] Xuzhou Med Coll, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Anesthesiol, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Anesthesia & Analgesia Appli, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Dept Crit Care Med, Zhongshan Hosp, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[6] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Obstet & Gynecol Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 419 Fangxie Rd, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2016年 / 9卷 / 08期
关键词
Ganglion impar block; chronic intractable pelvic pain; chronic intractable perineal pain; meta-analysis; UTEROSACRAL NERVE ABLATION; INDIVIDUAL PATIENT DATA; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY; ANATOMY; RELIEF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: The ganglion impar is an unpaired sympathetic structure located at the level of the sacrococcygeal joint. It is controversial regarding the effect of ganglion impar block (GIB) in the treatment of chronic intractable and/or perineal pain. This meta-analysis is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the efficacy and safety concerning GIB for chronic intractable pelvic and/or perineal pain, with all the existing trials. Methods: Electronic searches were conducted in Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, up to May 2015. The reference lists of the relevant articles were also searched. Selecting criterion is that GIB was used in one group as a treatment of chronic intractable pelvic and/or perineal pain. The effective data were gotten from 245 patients with chronic intractable pelvic and/or perineal pain. We analyzed the overall effective rate and the visual analogue scale (VAS: 0-10) (the baseline, post- treatment and one month later) to conclude the comprehensive effect. Results: GIB can significantly improve the condition of chronic intractable pelvic and/or perineal pain, with the overall response rates (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.01; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00 to 0.02; P<0.00001). There was a significant statistic difference between pre-and post-procedure of GIB (Mean Difference (MD) = -5.98; 95% CI: -7.14 to -4.81; P<0.00001). The subgroup analysis deduced the same excellent results, with pain region (pelvic area (pooled OR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.05; P<0.00001) and perineal area (pooled OR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.02; P<0.00001)) and method (GIB alone group (pooled OR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.03; P<0.00001) and the combined group (pooled OR = 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.03; P<0.00001)). What's more, the effect was continued to one month later (MD = -5.56; 95% CI: -6.93 to -4.18; P<0.00001). However, only few complications such as transient paresthesia and pain on injection were found. Conclusions: GIB has a evident effect on chronic intractable pelvic and/or perineal pain. This method should be used in treating chronic intractable pelvic and/or perineal pain.
引用
收藏
页码:15746 / 15754
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Abejón D., 2007, Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor, V14, P290
[2]   CT-guided Blocks and Neuroablation of the Ganglion Impar (Walther) in Perineal Pain Anatomy, Technique, Safety, and Efficacy [J].
Agarwal-Kozlowski, Kamayni ;
Lorke, Dietrich E. ;
Habermann, Christian R. ;
Esch, Jochen Schulte am ;
Beck, Helge .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 25 (07) :570-576
[3]  
Ahmed DG, 2015, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V18, pE49
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1985, SEX MED TODAY, V9, P8
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, REG ANESTH PAIN MED
[6]  
Anwer HMF, 2011, REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, V36, pE193
[7]   Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized evidence to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation in chronic pelvic pain [J].
Daniels, J. P. ;
Middleton, L. ;
Xiong, T. ;
Champaneria, R. ;
Johnson, N. P. ;
Lichten, E. M. ;
Sutton, C. ;
Vercellini, P. ;
Gray, R. ;
Hills, R. K. ;
Jones, K. D. ;
Aimi, G. ;
Khan, K. S. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2010, 16 (06) :568-576
[8]  
de Leon-Casasola O A, 2000, Cancer Control, V7, P142
[9]  
Demircay E, 2010, TURK NEUROSURG, V20, P328, DOI 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.2852-09.0
[10]   Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: The TREND statement [J].
Des Jarlais, DC ;
Lyles, C ;
Crepaz, N .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2004, 94 (03) :361-366