Monte Carlo simulation of induction time and metastable zone width; stochastic or deterministic?

被引:6
作者
Kubota, Noriaki [1 ]
机构
[1] Iwate Univ, Dept Chem & Biol Sci, 4-3-5 Ueda, Morioka, Iwate 0208551, Japan
关键词
Nucleation; Monte Carlo simulation; Induction time; Metastable zone width; Industrial crystallization; PRIMARY NUCLEATION; CRYSTAL NUCLEATION; CRYSTALLIZATION; KINETICS; VOLUME; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2017.12.031
中图分类号
O7 [晶体学];
学科分类号
0702 ; 070205 ; 0703 ; 080501 ;
摘要
The induction time and metastable zone width (MSZW) measured for small samples (say 1 mL or less) both scatter widely. Thus, these two are observed as stochastic quantities. Whereas, for large samples (say 1000 mL or more), the induction time and MSZW are observed as deterministic quantities. The reason for such experimental differences is investigated with Monte Carlo simulation. In the simulation, the time (under isothermal condition) and supercooling (under polythermal condition) at which a first single crystal is detected are defined as the induction time t and the MSZW Delta T for small samples, respectively. The number of crystals just at the moment of t and Delta T is unity. A first crystal emerges at random due to the intrinsic nature of nucleation, accordingly t and Delta T become stochastic. For large samples, the time and supercooling at which the number density of crystals N/V reaches a detector sensitivity (N/V)(det) are defined as t and Delta T for isothermal and polythermal conditions, respectively. The points of t and Delta T are those of which a large number of crystals have accumulated. Consequently, t and Delta T become deterministic according to the law of large numbers. Whether t and Delta T may stochastic or deterministic in actual experiments should not be attributed to change in nucleation mechanisms in molecular level. It could be just a problem caused by differences in the experimental definition of t and Delta T. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deterministic and Monte Carlo methods for simulation of plasma-surface interactions
    Marinov, Daniil
    Teixeira, Carlos
    Guerra, Vasco
    PLASMA PROCESSES AND POLYMERS, 2017, 14 (1-2)
  • [22] Effect of urea on metastable zone width, induction time and nucleation parameters of ammonium dihydrogen orthophosphate
    Rajesh, NP
    Perumal, CKL
    Raghavan, PS
    Ramasamy, P
    CRYSTAL RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 36 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [23] Monte-Carlo simulation of stochastic flow
    Grossmann, P
    GEC JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1996, 13 (03): : 175 - 187
  • [24] MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND VALUATION: A STOCHASTIC APPROACH
    Gois de Oliveira, Marcos Roberto
    de Medeiros Neto, Luiz Borges
    REGE-REVISTA DE GESTAO, 2012, 19 (03): : 493 - 511
  • [25] Determination of metastable zone and induction time of analgin for cooling crystallization
    Ling Zhou
    Zhao Wang
    Meijing Zhang
    Mingxia Guo
    Shijie Xu
    Qiuxiang Yin
    Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2017, 25 (03) : 313 - 318
  • [26] Determination of metastable zone width, induction period and primary nucleation kinetics for cooling crystallization of L-asparaginenohydrate
    Lenka, Maheswata
    Sarkar, Debasis
    JOURNAL OF CRYSTAL GROWTH, 2014, 408 : 85 - 90
  • [27] Effects of Ultrasound and Its Amplitude on the Metastable Zone Width, Induction Time, and Nucleation Kinetics of Pyrazinamide in Acetone
    Maharana, Abhishek
    Sarkar, Debasis
    INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2022, 61 (30) : 11262 - 11275
  • [28] Monte-Carlo simulation of a stochastic differential equation
    Arif ULLAH
    Majid KHAN
    M KAMRAN
    R KHAN
    盛正卯
    Plasma Science and Technology, 2017, 19 (12) : 10 - 18
  • [29] Monte-Carlo simulation of a stochastic differential equation
    Ullah, Arif
    Khan, Majid
    Kamran, M.
    Khan, R.
    Sheng, Zhengmao
    PLASMA SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 19 (12)
  • [30] Stochastic Analysis of Structures in Fire by Monte Carlo Simulation
    Shi, Kaihang
    Guo, Qianru
    Jeffers, Ann E.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL FIRE ENGINEERING, 2013, 4 (01) : 37 - 46