Simulation of the impact of commercial building envelope airtightness on building energy utilization

被引:0
作者
Emmerich, Steven J. [1 ]
McDowell, Timothy P. [1 ]
Anis, Wagdy [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Bldg & Fire Res Lab, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
来源
ASHRAE TRANSACTIONS 2007 VOL 113, PT 2 | 2007年 / 113卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a simulation study of the energy impact and cost-effectiveness of improving envelope airtightness in low-rise US commercial buildings. Despite common assumptions, measurements have shown that typical US commercial buildings are not particularly airtight. Past simulation studies have shown that commercial building envelope leakage can result in significant heating and cooling loads. To evaluate the potential energy savings and cost-effectiveness of an air barrier annual energy simulations and cost estimates were prepared for two nonresidential buildings (a two-story office building and, a one-story retail building) in five US cities. A coupled multizone airflow and building energy simulation tool was used to predict the energy use for the buildings at a target tightness level relative to a baseline level based on measurements in existing buildings. Predicted potential heating and cooling annual energy usage and cost savings ranged from 9% to 36% with the smallest savings occurring in the cooling-dominated climates of Phoenix and Miami.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 399
页数:21
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Anis WAY, 2001, ASHRAE J, V43, P31
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, 7238 NISTIR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 9012004 ANSI ASHRAE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, TM232000 CIBSE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, CONTAMW 2 0 USER MAN
  • [6] Äsk AC, 2003, ASHRAE J, V45, P28
  • [7] *ASTM, 1999, E77999 ASTM
  • [8] BRIGGS R, 1992, GRI9002361 PAC NW LA, V1
  • [9] *BSJ, 1998, BUILD SERV J APR
  • [10] *BSJ, 2003, BUILD SERV J SEP