Success of dental implants in patients with large bone defect and analysis of risk factors for implant failure: a non-randomized retrospective cohort study

被引:6
作者
Hasegawa, Takumi [1 ]
Sasaki, Aki [1 ]
Saito, Izumi [1 ]
Arimoto, Satomi [1 ]
Yatagai, Nanae [1 ]
Hiraoka, Yujiro [1 ]
Takeda, Daisuke [1 ]
Kakei, Yasumasa [1 ]
Akashi, Masaya [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Chuo Ku, Grad Sch Med, Kusunoki Cho, Kobe, Hyogo 6500017, Japan
关键词
Dental implant; Failure; Success; Dentomaxillary prosthesis; Oncologic patients; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STRESS-DISTRIBUTION; PROSTHETIC REHABILITATION; AUGMENTATION PROCEDURES; ORAL REHABILITATION; ENDOSTEAL IMPLANTS; DIAMETER IMPLANTS; SURVIVAL RATES; FOLLOW-UP; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-021-04249-0
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the success and survival rates of dental implants used for dentomaxillary prostheses at our hospital and the risk factors associated with large bone defects. Materials and methods A total of 138 external joint system implants used for dentomaxillary prostheses in 40 patients with large bone defects were included in this study. The alveolar bone at the site of implant insertion was evaluated using panoramic radiography and computed tomography. Various risk factors (demographic characteristics, dental status, and operative factors such as the employment of alveolar bone augmentation, the site, the length, and diameter of implants) for implant failure and complete implant loss were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses. The associations between the variables and the success and survival rates of dental implants were analyzed using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. Results The 10-year overall success and survival rates were 81.3% and 88.4% in this study. Multivariable analysis showed that the male sex (HR 6.22), shorter implants (<= 8.5 mm) (HR 5.21), and bone augmentation (HR 2.58) were independent predictors of success rate. Bone augmentation (HR 5.14) and narrow implants (<= 3.3 mm) (HR 3.86) were independent predictors of the survival rate. Conclusion Male sex, shorter or narrow implants, and bone augmentation were independent risk factors for dental implants used in dentomaxillary prostheses in patients with large bone defects. Clinical relevance. Clinicians should consider these risk factors and pay close attention to the management of these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2743 / 2750
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory study [J].
Allum, Simon Rupert ;
Tomlinson, Rachel Anne ;
Joshi, Rajendra .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (06) :553-559
[2]  
Anitua E, 2010, INT J PERIODONT REST, V30, P89
[3]   Survival of dental implants placed in vascularised fibula free flaps after jaw reconstruction [J].
Attia, Sameh ;
Wiltfang, Joerg ;
Pons-Kuehnemann, Joern ;
Wilbrand, Jan-Falco ;
Streckbein, Philipp ;
Kaehling, Christopher ;
Howaldt, Hans-Peter ;
Schaaf, Heidrun .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (08) :1205-1210
[4]   THE INFLUENCE OF IMPLANT DIAMETER AND LENGTH ON STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS RELATED TO CRESTAL BONE GEOMETRY: A THREE-DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS [J].
Baggi, Luigi ;
Cappelloni, Ilaria ;
Di Girolamo, Michele ;
Maceri, Franco ;
Vairo, Giuseppe .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2008, 100 (06) :422-431
[5]   A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants [J].
Bergkvist, Goran ;
Simonsson, Kjell ;
Rydberg, Kristofer ;
Johansson, Fredrik ;
Derand, Tore .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (01) :40-46
[6]   Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bitaraf, Tahereh ;
Keshtkar, Abbasali ;
Rokn, Amir Reza ;
Monzavi, Abbas ;
Geramy, Allahyar ;
Hashemi, Kazem .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 (04) :796-812
[7]   Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis [J].
Busenlechner, Dieter ;
Fuerhauser, Rudolf ;
Haas, Robert ;
Watzek, Georg ;
Mailath, Georg ;
Pommer, Bernhard .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTAL AND IMPLANT SCIENCE, 2014, 44 (03) :102-108
[8]   10-Year Survival and Success Rates of 511 Titanium Implants with a Sandblasted and Acid-Etched Surface: A Retrospective Study in 303 Partially Edentulous Patients [J].
Buser, Daniel ;
Janner, Simone F. M. ;
Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela ;
Braegger, Urs ;
Ramseier, Christoph A. ;
Salvi, Giovanni E. .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (06) :839-851
[9]   Short implants (≤6 mm) as an alternative treatment option to maxillary sinus lift [J].
Carosi, P. ;
Lorenzi, C. ;
Lio, F. ;
Laureti, M. ;
Ferrigno, N. ;
Arcuri, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (11) :1502-1510
[10]   Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla [J].
Chang, Shih-Hao ;
Lin, Chun-Li ;
Hsue, Shue-Sang ;
Lin, Yang-Sung ;
Huang, Shiang-Rung .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2012, 34 (02) :153-160