Folk-linguistic fictions and the explananda of the language sciences

被引:11
作者
Taylor, Talbot J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Coll William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187 USA
关键词
Folk metalinguistics; Naturalistic epistemology; Language science; Linguistic reflexivity; Hard problem of language; Linguistic ontology;
D O I
10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.05.001
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
For the past two millennia, the explananda of language theory have been inherited from the Western linguistic tradition. The legacy is what might be called "the Western linguistic imaginary": An indeterminate but deeply mesmerizing inventory of entities, properties, and powers of language commonly attributed to language and language-users and which therefore seem to stand in need of explanation. In recent years, naturalistic research programs in the cognitive sciences have provided illuminating explanations of basic ("lower-order") cognitive phenomena. The challenge today for the science of language is whether, in transforming itself along the lines of epistemological naturalism, it can provide similarly illuminating explanations of any of its traditional explananda. In addressing this challenge, greater attention needs to be given to the source of such explananda in the everyday, culturally-diverse practices of folk metalinguistics. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Agar M., 1994, Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation
[2]  
Agha A, 2007, STUD SOC CULT FOUND, V24, P1, DOI 10.2277/ 0521576857
[3]  
[Anonymous], LANGUAGE COMMUNICATI
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1989, HIST IDEES LINGUISTI
[5]  
Baumann Richard., 2003, Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality
[6]  
Besnier Niko., 1993, Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse
[7]  
BraddonMitchell D, 2009, CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS AND PHILOSOPHICAL NATURALISM, P1
[8]  
BRIGGS C, 1993, REFLEXIVE LANGUAGE R
[9]  
Chalmers D. J., 1995, J CONSCIOUSNESS STUD, V2, P200, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195311105.003.0001
[10]  
Churchland P., 2007, CONT DEBATES PHILOS