Prediction of the pathological fracture risk during stance and fall-loading configurations for metastases in the proximal femur, using a computed tomography-based finite element method

Background: It is important to assess the fracture risk associated with metastasis in the proximal femur. The study aimed to clarify the effect of tumor location on the risk of pathological fracture of the proximal femur and investigate the fracture risk not only in the stance-loading configuration (SC), but also in the fall-loading configuration (FC) using a computed tomography (CT)-based finite element (FE) method based on a simulated metastatic model. Methods: The axial CT scans of the proximal femora of non-osteoporotic healthy men (n = 4; age range, 42-48 years) and osteoporotic post-menopausal women (n = 4; age range, 69-78 years) were obtained with a calibration phantom, from which the three-dimensional FE models were constructed. A single 15 mm-diameter spherical void simulating a tumor was created at various locations from the neck to subtrochanteric level. Nonlinear FE analyses were performed. Results: The mean predicted fracture loads without spherical voids in the SC were 7700 N in men and 4370 N in women. With the void at the medial femoral neck and in the region anteromedial to lesser trochanter, the mean predicted fracture load significantly reduced to 51.3% and 59.4% in men and 34.1% and 64.5% in women, respectively. The mean predicted fracture loads without a spherical void in the FC were 2500 N in men and 1862 N in women. With the void at the medial and posterior femoral neck, the predicted fracture load was significantly reduced to 65.7% and 79.7% in men and 48.3% and 65.4% in women, respectively. Conclusions: These results showed that the risk of pathologic fracture was quite high in both the SC and FC when the lytic lesion existed along the principal compressive trabecular trajectory or posterior neck. Prophylactic intervention should be considered for metastases at these locations. (C) 2019 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.