Safe and effective sedation in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a randomized comparison between propofol continuous infusion and intermittent midazolam injection

被引:55
作者
Kiriyama, Shinsuke [1 ,3 ]
Gotoda, Takuji [1 ]
Sano, Hiromi [2 ]
Oda, Ichiro [1 ]
Nishimoto, Fumiya [1 ]
Hirashima, Tetsuro [1 ]
Kusano, Chika [1 ]
Kuwano, Hiroyuki [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Dept Endoscopy, Tokyo, Japan
[2] Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Gunma Univ, Dept Gen Surg Sci, Grad Sch Med, Gunma, Japan
关键词
Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Midazolam; Propofol; Sedation; UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; ROUTINE ERCP; ADMINISTERED PROPOFOL; REGISTERED NURSES; DEEP SEDATION; MEPERIDINE; COLONOSCOPY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1007/s00535-010-0222-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC) generally takes longer to perform than conventional endoscopy and usually requires moderate/deep sedation with close surveillance for patient safety. The aim of this study was to compare the safety profiles and recovery scores propofol continuous infusion and intermittent midazolam (MDZ) injection as sedation for ESD. Sixty EGC patients scheduled for ESDs between August and November 2008 were included in this prospective study and randomly divided into a propofol (P-group, 28 patients) and an MDZ (M-group, 32 patients) group using an odd-even system. The P-group received a 0.8 mg/kg induction dose and a 3 mg/kg/h maintenance dose of 1% propofol using an infusion pump. All patients received 15 mg pentazocine at the start of the ESD and at 60-min intervals thereafter. We recorded and analyzed blood pressure, oxygen saturation and heart rate during and following the procedure and evaluated post-anesthetic recovery scores (PARS) and subsequent alertness scores. The propofol maintenance and total dose amounts were (mean +/- A standard deviation) 3.7 +/- A 0.6 mg/kg/h and 395 +/- A 202 mg, respectively. The mean total dose of MDZ was 10.3 +/- A 4.5 mg. There were no cases of de-saturation < 90% or hypotension < 80 mmHg in either group. Alertness scores 15 and 60 min after the procedures were significantly higher in the P-group (4.9/4.9) than in the M-group (4.6/4.5; p < 0.05). The mean PARS 15 and 30 min after the ESDs were significantly higher in the P-group (9.6/9.9) than in the M-group (8.6/9.2; p < 0.01). Based on our results, the ESDs for EGC performed under sedation using propofol continuous infusion were as safe as those performed using intermittent MDZ injection. Propofol-treated patients had a quicker recovery profile than those treated with MDZ. We therefore recommend the use of continuous propofol sedation for ESD, but sedation guidelines for the use of propofol are necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 837
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Aldrete J A, 1998, J Perianesth Nurs, V13, P148, DOI 10.1016/S1089-9472(98)80044-0
  • [2] ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
  • [3] SEDATION FOR UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM
    CARLSSON, U
    GRATTIDGE, P
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 27 (03) : 240 - 243
  • [4] Training guideline for use of propofol in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Chutkan, R
    Cohen, J
    Abedi, M
    Cruz-Correa, M
    Dominitz, J
    Gersin, K
    Greenwald, D
    Kantsevoy, S
    Kowdley, K
    Nguyen, M
    Soetikno, R
    Telford, J
    Vargo, J
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [5] Nurse-administered propofol sedation compared with midazolam and meperidine for EUS: a prospective, randomized trial
    DeWitt, John
    McGreevy, Kathleen
    Sherman, Stuart
    Imperiale, Thomas F.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (03) : 499 - 509
  • [6] Diab FH, 1996, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V91, P1120
  • [7] Target-controlled propofol infusion during monitored anesthesia in patients undergoing ERCP
    Fanti, L
    Agostoni, M
    Casati, A
    Guslandi, M
    Giollo, P
    Torri, G
    Testoni, PA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (03) : 361 - 366
  • [8] Clinical analysis of propofol deep sedation for 1,104 patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: A three year prospective study
    Gasparovic, Stojanka
    Rustemovic, Nadan
    Opacic, Milorad
    Premuzic, Marina
    Korusic, Andelko
    Bozikov, Jadranka
    Bates, Tamara
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2006, 12 (02) : 327 - 330
  • [9] Safety and effectiveness of ketamine as a sedative agent for pediatric GI endoscopy
    Gilger, MA
    Spearman, RS
    Dietrich, CL
    Spearman, G
    Wilsey, MJ
    Zayat, MN
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (06) : 659 - 663
  • [10] Gross JB, 2002, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V96, P1004