Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits

被引:37
作者
Cook, Chelsea N. [1 ]
Mosqueiro, Thiago [2 ]
Brent, Colin S. [3 ]
Ozturk, Cahit [1 ]
Gadau, Juergen [4 ]
Pinter-Wollman, Noa [2 ]
Smith, Brian H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Evolutionary Biol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] USDA, ALARC, Dept Pest Management, Maricopa, AZ USA
[4] Univ Munster, Inst Evolut & Biodivers, Munster, Germany
关键词
exploration-exploitation trade-off; foraging; honeybee; latent inhibition; non-associative learning; scout; tyramine; BEE APIS-MELLIFERA; LATENT INHIBITION; OF-LABOR; RESPONSE THRESHOLDS; HERITABLE VARIATION; OCTOPAMINE; TYRAMINE; RESPONSIVENESS; COLONIES; SUCROSE;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2656.12911
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Animals must effectively balance the time they spend exploring the environment for new resources and exploiting them. One way that social animals accomplish this balance is by allocating these two tasks to different individuals. In honeybees, foraging is divided between scouts, which tend to explore the landscape for novel resources, and recruits, which tend to exploit these resources. Exploring the variation in cognitive and physiological mechanisms of foraging behaviour will provide a deeper understanding of how the division of labour is regulated in social insect societies. Here, we uncover how honeybee foraging behaviour may be shaped by predispositions in performance of latent inhibition (LI), which is a form of non-associative learning by which individuals learn to ignore familiar information. We compared LI between scouts and recruits, hypothesizing that differences in learning would correlate with differences in foraging behaviour. Scouts seek out and encounter many new odours while locating novel resources, while recruits continuously forage from the same resource, even as its quality degrades. We found that scouts show stronger LI than recruits, possibly reflecting their need to discriminate forage quality. We also found that scouts have significantly elevated tyramine compared to recruits. Furthermore, after associative odour training, recruits have significantly diminished octopamine in their brains compared to scouts. These results suggest that individual variation in learning behaviour shapes the phenotypic behavioural differences between different types of honeybee foragers. These differences in turn have important consequences for how honeybee colonies interact with their environment. Uncovering the proximate mechanisms that influence individual variation in foraging behaviour is crucial for understanding the ecological context in which societies evolve.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 246
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ADAPT LEARN INTERDIS
[2]   Octopamine modulates responsiveness to foraging-related stimuli in honey bees (Apis mellifera) [J].
Barron, AB ;
Schulz, DJ ;
Robinson, GE .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 188 (08) :603-610
[3]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[4]   A Computational Framework for Understanding Decision Making through Integration of Basic Learning Rules [J].
Bazhenov, Maxim ;
Huerta, Ramon ;
Smith, Brian H. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (13) :5686-5697
[5]   How long will honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) be stimulated by scent to revisit past-profitable forage sites? [J].
Beekman, M .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY A-NEUROETHOLOGY SENSORY NEURAL AND BEHAVIORAL PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 191 (12) :1115-1120
[6]   The use of waggle dance information by honey bees throughout their foraging careers [J].
Biesmeijer, J ;
Seeley, T .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2005, 59 (01) :133-142
[7]   Exploration and exploitation of food sources by social insect colonies: a revision of the scout-recruit concept [J].
Biesmeijer, JC ;
de Vries, H .
BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2001, 49 (2-3) :89-99
[8]  
Bitterman M.E., 1972, INHIBITION LEARNING, P153
[9]   CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING OF PROBOSCIS EXTENSION IN HONEYBEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) [J].
BITTERMAN, ME ;
MENZEL, R ;
FIETZ, A ;
SCHAFER, S .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 97 (02) :107-119
[10]   Demand for task performance and workforce replacement:: Undertakers in honeybee, Apis mellifera, colonies [J].
Breed, MD ;
Williams, DB ;
Queral, A .
JOURNAL OF INSECT BEHAVIOR, 2002, 15 (03) :319-329