Who is on the primary care team? Professionals' perceptions of the conceptualization of teams and the underlying factors: a mixed-methods study

被引:33
作者
Doekhie, Kirti D. [1 ]
Buljac-Samardzic, Martina [1 ]
Strating, Mathilde M. H. [1 ]
Paauwe, Jaap [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, ESHPM, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Dept Appl Econ, POB 1738, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Human Resource Studies, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
关键词
Primary care; Primary care professionals; Primary care teams; Teamwork; Team fluidity; Relational coordination; Mixed-methods; HEALTH-CARE; RELATIONAL COORDINATION; STRATEGIC CORE; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; MEMBERSHIP; COMMUNITY; MODEL; COLLABORATION; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-017-0685-2
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Due to the growing prevalence of elderly patients with multi-morbidity living at home, there is an increasing need for primary care professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds to collaborate as primary care teams. However, it is unclear how primary care professionals conceptualize teams and what underlying factors influence their perception of being part of a team. Our research question is: What are primary care professionals' perceptions of teams and team membership among primary care disciplines and what factors influence their perceptions? Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study in the Dutch primary care setting. First, a survey study of 152 professionals representing 12 primary care disciplines was conducted, focusing on their perceptions of which disciplines are part of the team and the degree of relational coordination between professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds. Subsequently, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 32 professionals representing 5 primary care disciplines to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying factors influencing their perceptions and the (mis) alignment between these perceptions. Results: Misalignments were found between perceptions regarding which disciplines are members of the team and the relational coordination between disciplines. For example, general practitioners were viewed as part of the team by helping assistants, (district) nurses, occupational therapists and geriatric specialized practice nurses, whereas the general practitioners themselves only considered geriatric specialized practice nurses to be part of their team. Professionals perceive multidisciplinary primary care teams as having multiple inner and outer layers. Three factors influence their perception of being part of a team and acting accordingly: a) knowing the people you work with, b) the necessity for knowledge exchange and c) sharing a holistic view of caregiving. Conclusion: Research and practice should take into account the misalignment between primary care professionals' perceptions of primary care teams, as our study notes variations in the conceptualization of primary care teams. To enhance teamwork between professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds, professionals acknowledge the importance of three underlying conditions: team familiarity, regular and structured knowledge exchange between all professionals involved in the care process and realizing and believing in the added value for patients of working as a team.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[51]   Multidisciplinary team simulation for the operating theatre: a review of the literature [J].
Tan, Shaw Boon ;
Pena, Guilherme ;
Altree, Meryl ;
Maddern, Guy J. .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 84 (7-8) :515-522
[52]   Teams Are Changing: Are Research and Practice Evolving Fast Enough? [J].
Tannenbaum, Scott I. ;
Mathieu, John E. ;
Salas, Eduardo ;
Cohen, Debra .
INDUSTRIAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-PERSPECTIVES ON SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2012, 5 (01) :2-24
[53]   The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: A taxonomy [J].
Thompson, Andrew G. H. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2007, 64 (06) :1297-1310
[54]  
Thylefors Ingela, 2005, J Interprof Care, V19, P102, DOI 10.1080/13561820400024159
[55]  
Triantafillou J., 2010, Informal care in the long-term care system - European Overview
[56]   The effectiveness of inter-professional working for older people living in the community: a systematic review [J].
Trivedi, Daksha ;
Goodman, Claire ;
Gage, Heather ;
Baron, Natasha ;
Scheibl, Fiona ;
Iliffe, Steve ;
Manthorpe, Jill ;
Bunn, Frances ;
Drennan, Vari .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2013, 21 (02) :113-128
[57]   Developing interprofessional care plans in chronic care: a scoping review [J].
van Dongen, Jerome Jean Jacques ;
van Bokhoven, Marloes Amantia ;
Daniels, Ramon ;
van der Weijden, Trudy ;
Emonts, Wencke Wilhelmina Gerarda Petronella ;
Beurskens, Anna .
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2016, 17
[58]   The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research [J].
Wageman, Ruth ;
Gardner, Heidi ;
Mortensen, Mark .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2012, 33 (03) :301-315
[59]   Patient Care Teams in treatment of diabetes and chronic heart failure in primary care: an observational networks study [J].
Weenink, Jan-Willem ;
van Lieshout, Jan ;
Jung, Hans Peter ;
Wensing, Michel .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2011, 6
[60]   Coordination between formal providers and informal caregivers [J].
Weinberg, Dana Beth ;
Lusenhop, R. William ;
Gittell, Jody Hoffer ;
Kautz, Cori M. .
HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (02) :140-149