Dose calculation of different eye substructures using a realistic eye model when treating ocular tumors with electron therapy

被引:4
作者
Vejdani-Noghreiyan, A. [1 ]
Ebrahimi-Khankook, A. [1 ]
Rahmani, E. [1 ]
Sakhaee, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Neyshabur, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, Neyshabur, Iran
关键词
eye melanoma; realistic eye model; electron beam; Monte Carlo simulation; FRACTIONATED STEREOTACTIC RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION-THERAPY; CONVERSION COEFFICIENTS; UVEAL MELANOMA; BEAM; RETINOBLASTOMA; PROTON; CANCER; LENS; CERROBEND;
D O I
10.1051/radiopro/2016022
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
One of the most frequent types of intraocular melanoma in adults is choroidal uveal melanoma. The most commonly used forms of radiation therapy are ophthalmic plaque brachytherapy and charged particle external radiation therapy. In the absence of adequate facilities for brachytherapy and proton therapy, electron therapy would be an efficient radiation therapy technique for treating eye melanomas. In the present work, the Monte Carlo code MCNPX 2.6.0 was used to calculate the dose distribution to substructures of the eye in electron therapy of three common choroidal tumors. The simulations were performed for 6 electron beams with nominal energies between 5 MeV and 10 MeV and also for 10 incidence angles. To identify suitable treatment plans, the tumor-to-sensitive zone dose ratios were estimated. Moreover, the equivalent doses delivered to healthy substructures of the eye were also calculated. The results indicate that for the treatment of tumors located at the posterior part of the eye, an electron beam with energy of 10 MeV and incident angle of 45 degrees relative to the eye axis provides the best tumor coverage while optimally sparing other eye substructures. In addition, for tumors positioned on the upper and lower parts of the vitreous, electron beams with energy of 10 MeV, an azimuthal angle of 270 degrees, and polar incident angles of 90 degrees and 105 degrees, respectively, lead to appropriate dose delivery.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 186
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
ABRAMSON DH, 1981, B NEW YORK ACAD MED, V57, P787
[2]   OPTIMAL ELECTRON-BEAM TREATMENT PLANNING FOR RETINOBLASTOMA USING A NEW 3-DIMENSIONAL MONTE-CARLO-BASED TREATMENT PLANNING SYSTEM [J].
ALBETERI, AA ;
RAESIDE, DE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (01) :125-135
[3]   Dose conversion coefficients for electron exposure of the human eye lens [J].
Behrens, R. ;
Dietze, G. ;
Zankl, M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (13) :4069-4087
[4]   External ream radiation therapy and retinoblastoma: Long-term results in the comparison of two techniques [J].
Blach, LE ;
McCormick, B ;
Abramson, DH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (01) :45-51
[5]   DIMENSIONS OF HUMAN EYE RELEVANT TO RADIATION PROTECTION [J].
CHARLES, MW ;
BROWN, N .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1975, 20 (02) :202-218
[6]   Comparison between small radiation therapy electron beams collimated by Cerrobend and tubular applicators [J].
Di Venanzio, Cristina ;
Marinelli, Marco ;
Tonnetti, Alessia ;
Verona-Rinati, Gianluca ;
Bagala, Paolo ;
Falco, Maria Daniela ;
Guerra, Antonio Stefano ;
Pimpinella, Maria .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (01) :329-335
[7]   First macro Monte Carlo based commercial dose calculation module for electron beam treatment planning - new issues for clinical consideration [J].
Ding, George X. ;
Duggan, Dennis M. ;
Coffey, Charles W. ;
Shokrani, Parvaneh ;
Cygler, Joanna E. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (11) :2781-2799
[8]   A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm [J].
Ding, GX ;
Cygler, JE ;
Yu, CW ;
Kalach, NI ;
Daskalov, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 63 (02) :622-633
[9]   DOSE-VOLUME HISTOGRAMS [J].
DRZYMALA, RE ;
MOHAN, R ;
BREWSTER, L ;
CHU, J ;
GOITEIN, M ;
HARMS, W ;
URIE, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 21 (01) :71-78
[10]  
Farajollahi A R, 2015, J Biomed Phys Eng, V5, P77