A unit commitment and economic dispatch model of the GB electricity market - Formulation and application to hydro pumped storage

被引:10
作者
Chyong, Chi Kong [1 ]
Newbery, David [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge Judge Business Sch, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Fac Econ, Econ, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, EPRG, Cambridge, England
关键词
Economic modelling; Unit commitment; Economic dispatch; Electricity market modelling; Hydro pumped energy storage; Wind energy; Solar energy; Electrical energy storage investment; ENERGY-STORAGE; WIND POWER; GREAT-BRITAIN; THERMAL UNIT; SPOT PRICES; GENERATION; SYSTEM; INTEGRATION; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113213
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We present a calibrated unit commitment dispatch model of the GB electricity market applied to an economic analysis of the four existing hydro pumped storage (PS) stations in GB. More variable renewable electricity (VRE) increases PS profit by an amount dependent on the generation mix. With a large share of coal, a 1 percentage point (p.p) increase in VRE increases total PS profit by an average of 2.3 p.p. With a more flexible system, to achieve a similar profitability, the share of wind and solar should rise to more than 60% of supply. Inflexible coal with high VRE increases price volatility that drives PS arbitrage revenue. Higher system flexibility smooths VRE variability and limits PS price arbitrage, increasing the role of PS balancing and ancillary service revenue. Between 2015 and 22 PS stations were inactive in managing transmission constraints but provided 18% of fast reserve, response and other reserve services in 2022. Stacking up the modelled revenue from price arbitrage and 2022 balancing and ancillary services revenues against the ongoing fixed costs suggests that the four existing PS stations are quite profitable. However, the revenues will not be enough to cover capex and opex of a new 600 MW PS station without more balancing and ancillary services market opportunities.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Recent approaches of unit commitment in the presence of intermittent renewable energy resources: A review [J].
Abujarad, Saleh Y. ;
Mustafa, M. W. ;
Jamian, J. J. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 70 :215-223
[2]   GHG mitigation schemes and energy policies: A model-based assessment for the Italian economy [J].
Annicchiarico, Barbara ;
Battles, Susan ;
Di Dio, Fabio ;
Molina, Pierfrancesco ;
Zoppoli, Pietro .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 61 :495-509
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, MAKING ELECTRICITY S
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Ten-year network development plan 2016
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Net zero strategy: build back better
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, The Value of Lost Load (VoLL) for Electricity in Great Britain: Final report for OFGEM and DECC
[7]   Optimal response of a thermal unit to an electricity spot market [J].
Arroyo, JM ;
Conejo, AJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2000, 15 (03) :1098-1104
[8]   The economy-wide effects of large-scale renewable electricity expansion in Europe: The role of integration costs [J].
Bachner, Gabriel ;
Steininger, Karl W. ;
Williges, Keith ;
Tuerk, Andreas .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 134 :1369-1380
[9]   Towards an objective method to compare energy storage technologies: development and validation of a model to determine the upper boundary of revenue available from electrical price arbitrage [J].
Barbour, Edward ;
Wilson, I. A. Grant ;
Bryden, Ian G. ;
McGregor, Peter G. ;
Mulheran, Paul A. ;
Hall, Peter J. .
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2012, 5 (01) :5425-5436
[10]   Energy arbitrage and market opportunities for energy storage facilities in Ontario [J].
Bassett, Kyle ;
Carriveau, Rupp ;
Ting, David S-K .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2018, 20 :478-484