Socio-ecological drivers of public conservation voting: Restoring gray wolves to Colorado, USA

被引:22
作者
Ditmer, Mark A. [1 ,2 ]
Niemiec, Rebecca M. [3 ]
Wittemyer, George [1 ]
Crooks, Kevin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, USDA, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Ogden, UT 84401 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dimens Nat Resources, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
ballot initiative; conservation initiative; politicization; public conservation behavior; species reintroduction; voting patterns; wolf reintroduction; wolf restoration; SOCIAL TRUST; ATTITUDES; WOLF; MANAGEMENT; CONFLICT; VALUES;
D O I
10.1002/eap.2532
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Understanding factors that influence real-world public conservation behaviors is critical for developing successful conservation policies and management actions. Citizens of Colorado, USA recently passed a ballot initiative to restore the gray wolf to its former range within the state. The >3 million votes offer an unprecedented opportunity to test factors that influenced decisions to support or oppose this conservation action. We created spatial linear regression models to assess the relationship between support for wolf restoration and (1) the presidential vote, (2) distance to conservation intervention (i.e., proposed wolf reintroduction and existing wolves), and measures of (3) livelihood and (4) demographics using precinct-level data. Our results demonstrate the strong relationship between support for wolf restoration and political support for the Democratic candidate for president in the 2020 election, and highlight how other factors, including increased age, participation in elk hunting, and proximity to the reintroduction region were associated with less support. Our findings underscore the critical role of politicization on public conservation action and the need to develop outreach and engagement strategies to mitigate polarization.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Adams W.M., 2015, Conflicts in Conservation: Navigating Towards Solutions, P64, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139084574.006, 10.1017/CBO9781139084574.006]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, NEW YORK TIMES THE U
[3]   Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Moeser, Guido .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) :14-25
[4]   Counteracting the Politicization of Science [J].
Bolsen, Toby ;
Druckman, James N. .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2015, 65 (05) :745-769
[5]  
Bruskotter J. T., 2009, Human Dimensions of Wildlife, V14, P119, DOI 10.1080/10871200802712571
[6]   Following the Leader: Using Opinion Leaders in Environmental Strategic Communication [J].
Dalrymple, Kajsa E. ;
Shaw, Bret R. ;
Brossard, Dominique .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (12) :1438-1453
[7]   Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves [J].
Eriksson, Max ;
Sandstrom, Camilla ;
Ericsson, Goran .
WILDLIFE BIOLOGY, 2015, 21 (03) :131-137
[8]   The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes [J].
Feinberg, Matthew ;
Willer, Robb .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 24 (01) :56-62
[9]   Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010 [J].
Gauchat, Gordon .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 77 (02) :167-187
[10]   Wolves are back: Sociopolitical identity and opinions on management ofCanis lupus [J].
Hamilton, Lawrence C. ;
Lambert, Joanna E. ;
Lawhon, Lydia Anne ;
Salerno, Jonathan ;
Hartter, Joel .
CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2 (07)