Continuous cropping legumes in semi-arid Southern Africa: Legume productivity and soil health implications

被引:1
作者
Jani, Arun D. [1 ,2 ]
Motis, Timothy N. [1 ]
Longfellow, Joy M. [1 ,3 ]
Lingbeek, Brandon J. [1 ]
D'Aiuto, Christopher J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] ECHO Inc, 17391 Durrance Rd, North Ft Myers, FL 33917 USA
[2] Calif State Univ Monterey Bay, Dept Biol & Chem, 100 Campus Ctr, Seaside, CA 93955 USA
[3] Johnnys Selected Seeds, 955 Benton Ave, Winslow, ME 04901 USA
[4] Provost & Pritchard Consulting Grp, 130 North Garden St, Visalia, CA 93291 USA
关键词
Legumes; Soil health; Southern Africa; Nutrient cycling; TROPICAL FORAGE LEGUMES; NORTHERN GUINEA SAVANNA; MINERALIZABLE NITROGEN; ORGANIC-MATTER; COVER CROPS; MAIZE; AGRICULTURE; DECOMPOSITION; SYSTEMS; YIELD;
D O I
10.1017/S0014479722000138
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Legume agronomic research in Southern Africa has often focused on integrating legumes into smallholder cereal cropping systems, but there is limited information available on the feasibility and soil health implications of continuous cropping legumes in the region. Continuous legumes may be suitable in areas with large livestock populations where a premium is placed on high-quality forage, or where efforts are underway to reclaim degraded cropland. Our objectives in this study were to (i) evaluate the performance of diverse legumes under continuous cropping and conservation tillage management with no fertility inputs and (ii) assess the response of soil health parameters to continuous legumes in a semi-arid environment. A 4-year study was conducted in Limpopo, South Africa beginning in the 2011-2012 growing season in which 10 legume and fallow treatments were imposed in the same plots for 4 growing seasons. All legumes responded negatively in varying degrees to continuous cropping in terms of biomass and nutrient accumulation. Lablab (Lablab purpureus L.) was the top-performing legume in the study and accumulated 4.5-13 Mg ha(-1) of biomass and 153-345, 11-34, and 75-286 kg ha(-1) of N, P, and K, respectively. Lablab often outperformed natural fallow, while other legumes generally performed as well as or inferior to natural fallow, depending on species and growing season. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp) was especially incompatible with continuous cropping and averaged less than 252 kg ha(-1) and 2.1 Mg ha(-1) of grain and biomass, respectively, from 2012-2013 to 2014-2015. Continuous cropping did not lead to sustained improvements in soil health. By 2014-2015, soil organic matter for all treatments had either declined or resembled baseline values. Rates of potentially mineralizable N in cowpea, lablab, vining mucuna (Mucuna pruriens var. Utilis), natural fallow, and bare ground plots fell by 70-96% during the study. There was also evidence for lower recovery of leached K by legumes compared to natural fallow species. In conclusion, legumes, such as lablab, should be considered as continuous forages on marginal land in areas where high-quality forage is in demand, but continuous cropping legumes without fertility inputs are not an effective strategy for improving soil health on degraded cropland in this semi-arid region of Southern Africa. Future research efforts may focus on the grazing strategies and baling frequencies required to optimize annual biomass accumulation of continuous lablab to meet livestock demand and support smallholder livelihoods.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Abad P, 2003, MOL PLANT PATHOL, V4, P217, DOI [10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00170.x, 10.1046/J.1364-3703.2003.00170.X]
[2]  
Adegbite A. A., 2011, American Journal of Experimental Agriculture, V1, P79
[3]  
Adegbite A. A., 2007, World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, V3, P256
[4]  
Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa (AgriLASA), 2004, AGRILASA SOIL HDB
[5]  
Bagayoko M., 1996, African Crop Sci. J, V4, P453
[6]  
Barratt N., 2006, Agrekon, V45, P106
[7]   Do Grass and Legume Cover Crops Improve Soil Properties in the Long Term? [J].
Blanco-Canqui, Humberto ;
Jasa, Paul J. .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2019, 83 (04) :1181-1187
[8]   Soil structure and management: a review [J].
Bronick, CJ ;
Lal, R .
GEODERMA, 2005, 124 (1-2) :3-22
[9]  
Chawe KG., 2019, J ADV BIOL BIOTECHNO, V21, P1, DOI [DOI 10.9734/JABB/2019/V21I130081, 10.9734/jabb/2019/v21i130081]
[10]  
Cook B., 2020, Tropical Forages: An interactive selection tool