A fast methodology to rank adsorbents for CO2 capture with temperature swing adsorption

被引:55
作者
Gutierrez-Ortega, A. [1 ,2 ]
Nomen, R. [1 ]
Sempere, J. [1 ]
Parra, J. B. [3 ]
Montes-Moran, M. A.
Gonzalez-Olmos, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ramon Llull, IQS Sch Engn, Via Augusta 390, Barcelona 08017, Spain
[2] GasN2, Poligon Ind Mas Cisa, Carrer Roure Gros 23, Barcelona 08181, Spain
[3] Inst Ciencia Tecnologia Carbono, INCAR CSIC, Francisco Pintado Fe 26, Oviedo 33011, Spain
关键词
Carbon Capture; Temperature Swing Adsorption (TSA); CCS; Zeolite; COMMERCIAL ACTIVATED CARBON; ZEOLITE; 13X; FLUE-GAS; DIOXIDE CAPTURE; EQUILIBRIUM; SEPARATION; CAPACITY; PERFORMANCE; SORBENTS; KINETICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cej.2022.134703
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A new methodology for evaluating different commercial adsorbents for CO2 capture using temperature swing adsorption (TSA) has been developed. The screening method is based on thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) combined with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) to study the cyclic behavior of adsorbents paying attention on CO2 production and desorption energy. COv production and desorption energy were determined for commercial zeolites using a simulated flue gas (15% CO2 / 85% N-2 v/v). Binderless zeolites had better CO2 production and lower desorption energy on TSA cycles than their analog binder-based zeolites. The zeolite with the highest CO2 production (0.077 kgCO(2)/kgads center dot h) and the lowest desorption energy (0.56 kWh/kgCO(2)) was the 13XBL binderless zeolite. On the other side, the 5A zeolites (binder and binderless) had the lowest CO2 production (0.046-0.054 kgCO2/kgads center dot h) and the highest desorption energy (0.78-0.93 kWh/kgCO(2)) among zeolites. Results obtained demonstrated that the proposed methodology is a good basis for the fast selection of the best adsorbent and for the selection of the adsorption and desorption cycling temperatures in CO2 capture processes through TSA.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   A New Equilibrium Shortcut Temperature Swing Adsorption Model for Fast Adsorbent Screening [J].
Ajenifuja, Abdulmalik ;
Joss, Lisa ;
Jobson, Megan .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2020, 59 (08) :3485-3497
[2]   Analysis of dynamicCO2capture over13Xzeolite monoliths in the presence ofSOx,NOxand humidity [J].
Al-Naddaf, Qasim ;
Lawson, Shane ;
Rownaghi, Ali A. ;
Rezaei, Fateme .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2020, 66 (09)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, GLOBAL STATUS CCS 20
[4]   Energetic evaluation of swing adsorption processes for CO2 capture in selected MOFs and zeolites: Effect of impurities [J].
Bahamon, Daniel ;
Diaz-Marquez, Alejandro ;
Gamallo, Pablo ;
Vega, Lourdes F. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2018, 342 :458-473
[5]   Systematic evaluation of materials for post-combustion CO2 capture in a Temperature Swing Adsorption process [J].
Bahamon, Daniel ;
Vega, Lourdes F. .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2016, 284 :438-447
[6]   Carbon capture by physical adsorption: Materials, experimental investigations and numerical modeling and simulations - A review [J].
Ben-Mansour, R. ;
Habib, M. A. ;
Bamidele, O. E. ;
Basha, M. ;
Qasem, N. A. A. ;
Peedikakkal, A. ;
Laoui, T. ;
Ali, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 161 :225-255
[7]   Comparing Physisorption and Chemisorption Solid Sorbents for use Separating CO2 from Flue Gas using Temperature Swing Adsorption [J].
Berger, Adam Hughmanick ;
Bhown, Abhoyjit S. .
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 :562-567
[8]   Adsorption equilibrium of methane, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen on zeolite 13X at high pressures [J].
Cavenati, S ;
Grande, CA ;
Rodrigues, AE .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2004, 49 (04) :1095-1101
[9]   Zeolites and related sorbents with narrow pores for CO2 separation from flue gas [J].
Cheung, Ocean ;
Hedin, Niklas .
RSC ADVANCES, 2014, 4 (28) :14480-14494
[10]   COMPARISON OF ACTIVATED CARBON AND ZEOLITE 13X FOR CO2 RECOVERY FROM FLUE-GAS BY PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION [J].
CHUE, KT ;
KIM, JN ;
YOO, YJ ;
CHO, SH ;
YANG, RT .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 1995, 34 (02) :591-598