General versus spinal anaesthesia in proximal femoral fracture surgery - treatment outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Loncaric-katusin, Mirjana [1 ]
Miskovic, Petar [1 ]
Lavrnja-Skolan, Vlasta [1 ]
Katusin, Juraj [2 ]
Bakota, Bore [3 ,4 ]
Zunic, Josip [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol Resuscitat & Intens Care Med, Karlovac, Croatia
[2] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Traumatol Unit, Karlovac, Croatia
[3] Brighton Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[4] Sussex Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2017年 / 48卷
关键词
anaesthesia; general; spinal; hip fracture surgery; complications; postoperative; mortality; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; HIP FRACTURE; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; UPDATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health problem because of the increasing proportion of elderly individuals in the general population. The mode of choice for anaesthesia in surgical treatment of these fractures is still debated in terms of better postoperative outcome. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of general over spinal anaesthesia on mortality in proximal femoral fracture surgery. Patients and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 115 patients aged at least 70 years who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture. The survey was conducted from 1 January to 31 December 2015 at the General Hospital Karlovac, Croatia. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - general anaesthesia and group 2 - spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the effect of mode of anaesthesia, general versus spinal, on mortality within 30 days, six months and one year after surgery. Results: General anaesthesia (EndoTracheal Anaesthesia) was administered in 77 patients (67%; group I - ETA) and spinal anaesthesia in 38 patients (33%; group 2 - SPIN). Both groups had more female than male patients: 69 patients (89.6%) in the ETA group and 32 patients (84.2%) in the SPIN group were female. The mean age in the ETA group was 82.91 years and in the SPIN group was 80.18 years. ASA II status was more common in patients in the SPIN group (25 patients [65.8%]). The average time from hospitalisation to surgery was 53.44 hours in the ETA group and 53.33 hours in the SPIN group. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of comorbidities, or intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups. Mortality after surgery in the ETA and SPIN groups, respectively, was as follows: 10.4% and 10.5% at 30 days, 23.4% and 15.8% at six months, and 32.5% and 31.6% at one year. Conclusion: The results indicate that the mode of anaesthesia (general vs spinal) has no effect on postoperative mortality, and that the mode of anaesthesia should be applied on an individual basis in correlation with associated comorbidities. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S51 / S55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improved outcomes for spinal versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a retrospective cohort study of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Weinstein, Eliana R.
    Boyer, Richard B.
    White, Robert S.
    Weinberg, Roniel Y.
    Lurie, Jacob M.
    Salvatierra, Nicolas
    Tedore, Tiffany R.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024, 49 (01) : 4 - 9
  • [42] Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus hemiarthroplasty: A study for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures
    Tang, Peifu
    Hu, Fangke
    Shen, Jing
    Zhang, Licheng
    Zhang, Lihai
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2012, 43 (06): : 876 - 881
  • [43] COMPARING SPINAL VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA IN HIP SURGERY: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Alkuwayti, Mohammed Abdulraouf
    Albarqi, Zaher Ahmed
    INDO AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 6 (01): : 2537 - 2544
  • [44] Pulmonary hypertension and femoral neck fracture: Interest of continuous spinal anaesthesia
    Turc, J.
    Lamblin, A.
    Klack, F.
    Wey, P. -F.
    Martinez, J. -Y.
    ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2012, 31 (06): : 557 - 559
  • [45] SmartPilot® view-guided anaesthesia improves postoperative outcomes in hip fracture surgery: a randomized blinded controlled study
    Leblanc, D.
    Conte, M.
    Masson, G.
    Richard, F.
    Jeanneteau, A.
    Bouhours, G.
    Chretien, J. M.
    Rony, L.
    Rineau, E.
    Lasocki, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (05) : 1022 - 1029
  • [46] Comparison of risk of complication between neuraxial anaesthesia and general anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Xi
    Li, Hairui
    Li, Songlin
    Wang, Yiou
    Ma, Ruichen
    Qian, Wenwei
    Chen, Gang
    Li, Jian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 109 (03) : 458 - 468
  • [47] Levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in orthopaedic major surgery
    Fattorini, F.
    Ricci, Z.
    Rocco, A.
    Romano, R.
    Pascarella, M. A.
    Pinto, G.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2006, 72 (7-8) : 637 - 644
  • [48] Regional versus general anesthesia in older patients for hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhou, Sheng-Liang
    Zhang, Shao-Yun
    Si, Hai-Bo
    Shen, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [49] Outcomes of Elderly Patients With Proximal Femoral Fractures According to Positive Criteria for Surgical Treatment
    Ishimaru, Daichi
    Ogawa, Hiroyasu
    Maeda, Masato
    Shimizu, Katsuji
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (03) : E353 - E358
  • [50] LiDCO-based fluid management in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery under spinal anaesthesia: a randomized trial and systematic review
    Moppett, I. K.
    Rowlands, M.
    Mannings, A.
    Moran, C. G.
    Wiles, M. D.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 114 (03) : 444 - 459