General versus spinal anaesthesia in proximal femoral fracture surgery - treatment outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Loncaric-katusin, Mirjana [1 ]
Miskovic, Petar [1 ]
Lavrnja-Skolan, Vlasta [1 ]
Katusin, Juraj [2 ]
Bakota, Bore [3 ,4 ]
Zunic, Josip [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol Resuscitat & Intens Care Med, Karlovac, Croatia
[2] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Traumatol Unit, Karlovac, Croatia
[3] Brighton Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[4] Sussex Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2017年 / 48卷
关键词
anaesthesia; general; spinal; hip fracture surgery; complications; postoperative; mortality; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; HIP FRACTURE; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; UPDATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health problem because of the increasing proportion of elderly individuals in the general population. The mode of choice for anaesthesia in surgical treatment of these fractures is still debated in terms of better postoperative outcome. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of general over spinal anaesthesia on mortality in proximal femoral fracture surgery. Patients and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 115 patients aged at least 70 years who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture. The survey was conducted from 1 January to 31 December 2015 at the General Hospital Karlovac, Croatia. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - general anaesthesia and group 2 - spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the effect of mode of anaesthesia, general versus spinal, on mortality within 30 days, six months and one year after surgery. Results: General anaesthesia (EndoTracheal Anaesthesia) was administered in 77 patients (67%; group I - ETA) and spinal anaesthesia in 38 patients (33%; group 2 - SPIN). Both groups had more female than male patients: 69 patients (89.6%) in the ETA group and 32 patients (84.2%) in the SPIN group were female. The mean age in the ETA group was 82.91 years and in the SPIN group was 80.18 years. ASA II status was more common in patients in the SPIN group (25 patients [65.8%]). The average time from hospitalisation to surgery was 53.44 hours in the ETA group and 53.33 hours in the SPIN group. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of comorbidities, or intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups. Mortality after surgery in the ETA and SPIN groups, respectively, was as follows: 10.4% and 10.5% at 30 days, 23.4% and 15.8% at six months, and 32.5% and 31.6% at one year. Conclusion: The results indicate that the mode of anaesthesia (general vs spinal) has no effect on postoperative mortality, and that the mode of anaesthesia should be applied on an individual basis in correlation with associated comorbidities. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S51 / S55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cost estimates of spinal versus general anaesthesia for fractured neck of femur surgery
    Chakladar, A.
    White, S. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (08) : 810 - 814
  • [32] Mortality and re-operation rate after proximal femoral fracture surgery by trainees
    Khunda, Aiman
    Jafari, Maya
    Alazzawi, Sulaiman
    Mountain, Alistair
    Hui, Anthony C. W.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (01) : 87 - 91
  • [33] Does the timing of surgery for proximal humeral fracture affect inpatient outcomes?
    Menendez, Mariano E.
    Ring, David
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (09) : 1257 - 1262
  • [34] Effect of nutritional status before femoral neck fracture surgery on postoperative outcomes: a retrospective study
    Yokoyama, Katsuya
    Ukai, Taku
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [35] Benefits of surgical treatment within 48 h of proximal femoral fracture in centenarians: a retrospective cohort study
    Shitahodo, Toshiya
    Murata, Shizumasa
    Kitano, Yoji
    Mera, Yoshimasa
    Iwahashi, Hiroki
    Inoue, Shingo
    Kawamura, Kota
    Yamada, Hiroshi
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [36] General versus spinal anaesthesia and postoperative delirium in an orthogeriatric population
    Ilango, Sivarajah
    Pulle, Ranjeev Chrys
    Bell, Jack
    Kuys, Suzanne S.
    AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL ON AGEING, 2016, 35 (01) : 42 - 47
  • [37] Difference in postoperative opioid consumption after spinal versus general anaesthesia for ankle fracture surgery-A retrospective cohort study
    Lehto, Pasi M.
    Vakkala, Merja A.
    Alahuhta, Seppo
    Liisanantti, Janne H.
    Kortekangas, Tero H. J.
    Hiltunen, Kaisu
    Nyman, Emma-Sofia
    Kaakinen, Timo I.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 65 (08) : 1109 - 1115
  • [38] Projected incidence of proximal femoral fracture in England: A report from the NHS Hip Fracture Anaesthesia Network (HIPFAN)
    White, S. M.
    Griffiths, R.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (11): : 1230 - 1233
  • [39] Anaesthesia for 1131 patients undergoing proximal femoral fracture repair: a retrospective, observational study of effects on blood pressure, fluid administration and perioperative anaemia
    Wood, R. J.
    White, S. M.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 66 (11) : 1017 - 1022
  • [40] A comparison of general versus regional anesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis
    Zuo, Di
    Jin, Chunyu
    Shan, Minhong
    Zhou, Lijuan
    Li, Yanshuang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (11): : 20295 - 20301