General versus spinal anaesthesia in proximal femoral fracture surgery - treatment outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Loncaric-katusin, Mirjana [1 ]
Miskovic, Petar [1 ]
Lavrnja-Skolan, Vlasta [1 ]
Katusin, Juraj [2 ]
Bakota, Bore [3 ,4 ]
Zunic, Josip [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol Resuscitat & Intens Care Med, Karlovac, Croatia
[2] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Traumatol Unit, Karlovac, Croatia
[3] Brighton Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[4] Sussex Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2017年 / 48卷
关键词
anaesthesia; general; spinal; hip fracture surgery; complications; postoperative; mortality; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; HIP FRACTURE; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; UPDATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health problem because of the increasing proportion of elderly individuals in the general population. The mode of choice for anaesthesia in surgical treatment of these fractures is still debated in terms of better postoperative outcome. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of general over spinal anaesthesia on mortality in proximal femoral fracture surgery. Patients and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 115 patients aged at least 70 years who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture. The survey was conducted from 1 January to 31 December 2015 at the General Hospital Karlovac, Croatia. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - general anaesthesia and group 2 - spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the effect of mode of anaesthesia, general versus spinal, on mortality within 30 days, six months and one year after surgery. Results: General anaesthesia (EndoTracheal Anaesthesia) was administered in 77 patients (67%; group I - ETA) and spinal anaesthesia in 38 patients (33%; group 2 - SPIN). Both groups had more female than male patients: 69 patients (89.6%) in the ETA group and 32 patients (84.2%) in the SPIN group were female. The mean age in the ETA group was 82.91 years and in the SPIN group was 80.18 years. ASA II status was more common in patients in the SPIN group (25 patients [65.8%]). The average time from hospitalisation to surgery was 53.44 hours in the ETA group and 53.33 hours in the SPIN group. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of comorbidities, or intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups. Mortality after surgery in the ETA and SPIN groups, respectively, was as follows: 10.4% and 10.5% at 30 days, 23.4% and 15.8% at six months, and 32.5% and 31.6% at one year. Conclusion: The results indicate that the mode of anaesthesia (general vs spinal) has no effect on postoperative mortality, and that the mode of anaesthesia should be applied on an individual basis in correlation with associated comorbidities. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S51 / S55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-effectiveness analysis of proximal femoral nail versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture
    Kutlu, Gamze
    Akbulut, Yasemin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [22] Comparison of Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Proximal Femoral Nailing and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty Techniques in Intertrochanteric Femur Fracture Treatment
    Yetis, Mehmet
    Yurdakul, Emre
    DUZCE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 24 (02) : 207 - 211
  • [23] Delayed surgery and health related quality of life in patients with proximal femoral fracture
    Merchan-Galvis, Angela Maria
    Munoz-Garcia, David Andres
    Solano, Felipe
    Velasquez, Julian Camilo
    Sotelo, Nelson Fernando
    Molina, David Alejandro
    Caicedo, Juan Pablo
    Concha, Juan Manuel
    Calvache, Jose Andres
    Martinez-Zapata, Maria Jose
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [24] The impact of regional versus general anesthesia on postoperative neurocognitive outcomes in elderly patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bhushan, Sandeep
    Huang, Xin
    Duan, Yuanqiong
    Xiao, Zongwei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 105
  • [25] Comparative evaluation of femoral nerve block and intravenous fentanyl for positioning during spinal anaesthesia in surgery of femur fracture
    Jadon, Ashok
    Kedia, Sunil Kumar
    Dixit, Shreya
    Chakraborty, Swastika
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2014, 58 (06) : 705 - 708
  • [26] Risk Factors for 30-Days Mortality After Proximal Femoral Fracture Surgery, a Cohort Study
    de Haan, Eveline
    Roukema, Gert R.
    van Rijckevorsel, Veronique A. J. I. M.
    Kuijper, Tjallingius M.
    de Jong, Louis
    CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2024, 19 : 539 - 549
  • [27] Perioperative outcomes in the context of mode of anaesthesia for patients undergoing hip fracture surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    O'Donnell, C. M.
    McLoughlin, L.
    Patterson, C. C.
    Clarke, M.
    McCourt, K. C.
    McBrien, M. E.
    McAuley, D. F.
    Shields, M. O.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [28] Impact of multiple nerves blocks anaesthesia on intraoperative hypotension and mortality in hip fracture surgery intermediate-risk elderly patients: A propensity score-matched comparison with spinal and general anaesthesia
    Mounet, Benjamin
    Choquet, Olivier
    Swisser, Fabien
    Biboulet, Philippe
    Bernard, Nathalie
    Bringuier, Sophie
    Capdevila, Xavier
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2021, 40 (04)
  • [29] Randomized controlled trial of goal-directed haemodynamic treatment in patients with proximal femoral fracture
    Bartha, E.
    Arfwedson, C.
    Imnell, A.
    Fernlund, M. E.
    Andersson, L. E.
    Kalman, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 110 (04) : 545 - 553
  • [30] Sacrococcygeal local anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomised trial
    Naja, MZ
    Ziade, MF
    El Rajab, M
    ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 58 (10) : 1007 - 1012