General versus spinal anaesthesia in proximal femoral fracture surgery - treatment outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Loncaric-katusin, Mirjana [1 ]
Miskovic, Petar [1 ]
Lavrnja-Skolan, Vlasta [1 ]
Katusin, Juraj [2 ]
Bakota, Bore [3 ,4 ]
Zunic, Josip [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol Resuscitat & Intens Care Med, Karlovac, Croatia
[2] Karlovac Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Traumatol Unit, Karlovac, Croatia
[3] Brighton Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[4] Sussex Univ Hosp, Trauma & Orthopaed Dept, Brighton, E Sussex, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2017年 / 48卷
关键词
anaesthesia; general; spinal; hip fracture surgery; complications; postoperative; mortality; EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES; HIP FRACTURE; MORTALITY; MANAGEMENT; UPDATE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Proximal femoral fractures are a major public health problem because of the increasing proportion of elderly individuals in the general population. The mode of choice for anaesthesia in surgical treatment of these fractures is still debated in terms of better postoperative outcome. The aim of our study was to compare the effect of general over spinal anaesthesia on mortality in proximal femoral fracture surgery. Patients and methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of 115 patients aged at least 70 years who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fracture. The survey was conducted from 1 January to 31 December 2015 at the General Hospital Karlovac, Croatia. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 - general anaesthesia and group 2 - spinal anaesthesia. The primary outcome measure was the effect of mode of anaesthesia, general versus spinal, on mortality within 30 days, six months and one year after surgery. Results: General anaesthesia (EndoTracheal Anaesthesia) was administered in 77 patients (67%; group I - ETA) and spinal anaesthesia in 38 patients (33%; group 2 - SPIN). Both groups had more female than male patients: 69 patients (89.6%) in the ETA group and 32 patients (84.2%) in the SPIN group were female. The mean age in the ETA group was 82.91 years and in the SPIN group was 80.18 years. ASA II status was more common in patients in the SPIN group (25 patients [65.8%]). The average time from hospitalisation to surgery was 53.44 hours in the ETA group and 53.33 hours in the SPIN group. There was no significant difference between groups in the number of comorbidities, or intraoperative and postoperative complications. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups. Mortality after surgery in the ETA and SPIN groups, respectively, was as follows: 10.4% and 10.5% at 30 days, 23.4% and 15.8% at six months, and 32.5% and 31.6% at one year. Conclusion: The results indicate that the mode of anaesthesia (general vs spinal) has no effect on postoperative mortality, and that the mode of anaesthesia should be applied on an individual basis in correlation with associated comorbidities. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S51 / S55
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Short-term complications in hip fracture surgery using spinal versus general anaesthesia
    Fields, Adam C.
    Dieterich, James D.
    Buterbaugh, Kristin
    Moucha, Calin S.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (04): : 719 - 723
  • [2] General versus spinal anaesthesia for patients aged 70 years and older with a fracture of the hip
    Basques, B. A.
    Bohl, D. D.
    Golinvaux, N. S.
    Samuel, A. M.
    Grauer, J. G.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (05) : 689 - 695
  • [3] Comparing general and spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery
    Xue, Fu-Shan
    Liu, Gao-Pu
    Sun, Chao
    Li, Rui-Ping
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (10): : 2083 - 2084
  • [4] Clinical Characteristics of Spinal versus General Anaesthesia in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Repair Surgery in Jordan: A Multicentre Study
    Al-Husinat, Lou'i
    Al Sharie, Sarah
    Araydah, Mohammad
    Al Modanat, Zaid
    Ismail, Mohammed I. A.
    Heilat, Hadeel B.
    Dawod, Mohd Said
    Sawaftah, Khaled Ahmad
    De Rosa, Silvia
    Battaglini, Denise
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [5] There is (probably) no (meaningful) difference in (most) outcomes between ′spinal′ and ′general′anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: time to move forward
    White, Stuart M.
    Shelton, Clifford L.
    Tedore, Tiffany
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2023, 130 (04) : 385 - 389
  • [6] Postoperative complaints after spinal and thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery - Spinal versus general anaesthesia
    Standl, T
    Eckert, S
    Esch, ISA
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1996, 40 (02) : 222 - 226
  • [7] Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter?
    Luger, T. J.
    Kammerlander, C.
    Gosch, M.
    Luger, M. F.
    Kammerlander-Knauer, U.
    Roth, T.
    Kreutziger, J.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 : S555 - S572
  • [8] Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter?
    T. J. Luger
    C. Kammerlander
    M. Gosch
    M. F. Luger
    U. Kammerlander-Knauer
    T. Roth
    J. Kreutziger
    Osteoporosis International, 2010, 21 : 555 - 572
  • [9] General versus Neuraxial Anesthesia on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Hip Fracture Surgery: An Analysis of the ACS NSQIP Database
    Wang, Ming-Tse
    Chang, Chuen-Chau
    Liu, Chih-Chung
    Fan Chiang, Yu-Hsuan
    Shih, Yu-Ru Vernon
    Lee, Yuan-Wen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (11)
  • [10] General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery-impact on mortality and length of stay
    Vaz, Ana S.
    Pina, Gabriel
    Figueiredo, Eduarda
    Magalhaes, Juliana
    Assuncao, Jose
    ANAESTHESIOLOGY INTENSIVE THERAPY, 2022, 54 (02) : 103 - 107