Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale

被引:13
作者
Christakou, Anna [1 ]
Andriopoulou, Maria [1 ]
Asimakopoulos, Panagiotis [2 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Patras, Dept Physiotherapy, Branch Dept Aigion, Aigion, Greece
[2] St Johns Hosp Howden, Livingston, W Lothian, Scotland
关键词
Disability; low back pain; scale; validity; reliability; QUESTIONNAIRE; OSWESTRY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.3233/BMR-2011-0288
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Low back pain is related to functional status and possible resulting disability. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) has been used widely to evaluate functional disability in patients with low back pain. The purpose of this study was to assess: (a) the face and content validity, (b) the factor structure, (c) the concurrent validity, (d) the discriminant validity, (e) the internal consistency and the test-retest reliability (ICC) of the Greek version of the QBPDS. Methods: One hundred and sixty patients with low back pain participated in the study. Face and content validity of the translated QBPDS were first investigated and afterwards exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was chosen to examine the factor structure of it. The concurrent and discriminant validity of the QBPDS was also assessed by a number of valid constructs. Finally, Cronbach alpha and Pearson r (ICC) were used to investigate the reliability of the instrument. Results: The face and content validity of the QBPDS were supported and the EFA confirmed the sixth initial factor structure of the instrument. The concurrent and discriminant validity of it was confirmed by examining correlations between the QBPDS with other constructs. The Cronbach a and the ICCs indices of the instrument were acceptable. Conclusion: The Greek translation of the QBPDS provided reliable and valid instrument for the evaluation of Greek patients with low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 154
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]   Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain [J].
Reneman, MF ;
Jorritsma, W ;
Schellekens, JMH ;
Göeken, LNH .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2002, 12 (03) :119-129
[32]  
REYNOLDS WM, 1982, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V38, P119, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO
[33]  
2-I
[34]   A STUDY OF THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF BACK PAIN .1. DEVELOPMENT OF A RELIABLE AND SENSITIVE MEASURE OF DISABILITY IN LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
ROLAND, M ;
MORRIS, R .
SPINE, 1983, 8 (02) :141-144
[35]   Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale [J].
Schoppink, LEM ;
vanTulder, MW ;
Koes, BW ;
Beurskens, SAJHM ;
deBie, RA .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1996, 76 (03) :268-275
[36]  
Tabachnick BG., 2019, Using multivariate statistics, V7
[37]   THE MOS 36-ITEM SHORT-FORM HEALTH SURVEY (SF-36) .1. CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK AND ITEM SELECTION [J].
WARE, JE ;
SHERBOURNE, CD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1992, 30 (06) :473-483
[38]  
West S., 1995, Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications, P56
[39]   Scale development research - A content analysis and recommendations for best practices [J].
Worthington, Roger L. ;
Whittaker, Tiffany A. .
COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 34 (06) :806-838
[40]   Validity of the French-language version of the Quebec back pain disability scale in low back pain patients in France [J].
Yvanes-Thomas, M ;
Calmels, P ;
Béthoux, F ;
Richard, A ;
Nayme, P ;
Payre, D ;
Laurent, B .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2002, 69 (04) :397-405