Validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale

被引:13
作者
Christakou, Anna [1 ]
Andriopoulou, Maria [1 ]
Asimakopoulos, Panagiotis [2 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Patras, Dept Physiotherapy, Branch Dept Aigion, Aigion, Greece
[2] St Johns Hosp Howden, Livingston, W Lothian, Scotland
关键词
Disability; low back pain; scale; validity; reliability; QUESTIONNAIRE; OSWESTRY; ISSUES;
D O I
10.3233/BMR-2011-0288
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Low back pain is related to functional status and possible resulting disability. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) has been used widely to evaluate functional disability in patients with low back pain. The purpose of this study was to assess: (a) the face and content validity, (b) the factor structure, (c) the concurrent validity, (d) the discriminant validity, (e) the internal consistency and the test-retest reliability (ICC) of the Greek version of the QBPDS. Methods: One hundred and sixty patients with low back pain participated in the study. Face and content validity of the translated QBPDS were first investigated and afterwards exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was chosen to examine the factor structure of it. The concurrent and discriminant validity of the QBPDS was also assessed by a number of valid constructs. Finally, Cronbach alpha and Pearson r (ICC) were used to investigate the reliability of the instrument. Results: The face and content validity of the QBPDS were supported and the EFA confirmed the sixth initial factor structure of the instrument. The concurrent and discriminant validity of it was confirmed by examining correlations between the QBPDS with other constructs. The Cronbach a and the ICCs indices of the instrument were acceptable. Conclusion: The Greek translation of the QBPDS provided reliable and valid instrument for the evaluation of Greek patients with low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 154
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
BABBIE E, 1992, PRACTICE SOCIAL RES, P113
[2]   Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-ovarian [J].
Basen-Engquist, K ;
Bodurka-Bevers, D ;
Fitzgerad, MA ;
Webster, K ;
Cella, D ;
Hu, SH ;
Gershenson, DM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (06) :1809-1817
[3]   Assessment of pain and disability in patients with chronic low back pain: Reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale and Pain Disability Index [J].
Bicer, A ;
Yazici, A ;
Camdeviren, H ;
Milcan, A ;
Erdogan, C .
JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2005, 18 (1-2) :37-44
[4]   Greek versions of the Oswestry and Roland-Morris disability questionnaires [J].
Boscainos, PJ ;
Sapkas, G ;
Stilianessi, E ;
Prouskas, K ;
Papadakis, SA .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (411) :40-53
[5]   PSYCHOSOCIAL PREDICTORS OF OUTCOME IN ACUTE AND SUBCHRONIC LOW-BACK TROUBLE [J].
BURTON, AK ;
TILLOTSON, KM ;
MAIN, CJ ;
HOLLIS, S .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (06) :722-728
[6]   THE PAIN DRAWING AND WADDELL NONORGANIC PHYSICAL SIGNS IN CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN [J].
CHAN, CW ;
GOLDMAN, S ;
ILSTRUP, DM ;
KUNSELMAN, AR ;
ONEILL, PI .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (13) :1717-1722
[7]   THE PAIN DISABILITY INDEX - FACTOR STRUCTURE AND NORMATIVE DATA [J].
CHIBNALL, JT ;
TAIT, RC .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1994, 75 (10) :1082-1086
[8]   An overview of the issues: Physiological effects of bed rest and restricted physical activity [J].
Convertino, VA ;
Bloomfield, SA ;
Greenleaf, JE .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1997, 29 (02) :187-190
[9]  
DEYO RA, 1988, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V69, P1044
[10]  
DUGGER TI, 2005, PAIN CLINIC, V17, P117